Jump to content


Photo

Numbers still going up so now I really need some advice!!


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 21 June 2016 - 02:35 PM

On May 3, 2016 I made the following post titled "Numbers are going up, need advice"

 

If you look at my signature it contains my complete history. I was PCRU for 9 months and now my numbers are on the rise. Any and all advice would be greatly appreciated. The only changes in my life are I have started taking an extremely mild diuretic for Ménière's disease and I have been dealing with a lot of very stressful events in my life. I am almost 46 years old and I am the mother of two teenage children. 

 

Several responded "retest quickly" and I did that - as you can see in my updated signature.

 

Trey said "This is not so unusual.  Very few have a PCR history which does not have some ups and downs.  It could just be testing variations." - so I stopped worrying :-)

 

Buzzm1 said "there should not be any interference with the Dyazide, the mild diuretic"

 

Well today I met with my oncologist and she wants to switch my oral chemo from Sprycel to Tasigna.  I was ok with the 0.12% only going to 0.19% especially after Trey's response to my last post, but she said she is not happy with my numbers. I told her I needed to think about this and do some research.  So here I am!!!  You guys are my research.  What should I do...wait it out?  or change?  STRESSING.....


Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#2 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 21 June 2016 - 02:43 PM

I do not know if the following will make any sense or not but my lab report says e13a2 not detected, e14a2 0.19% and minor e1a2.  Also by my calculations this is a 2 log increase since December 2015 (see numbers in my signature)....Can anyone explain this or let me know if my calculations are correct?

 

I have already had a mutation test and the results were the following:

No BCR-ABL1 fusion gene transcript was detected in this patient, thus the mutation analysis of the BCR-ABL1 kinase domain could not be performed.  .....  Can anyone explain this?

 

I am planning on getting a second opinion so if anyone can tell me the name of a great CML oncologist here in North Carolina (I live in Charlotte) that would also be great!!??


Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#3 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 21 June 2016 - 03:22 PM

Your PCR was said to be PCRU during the end of 2015.  It seems likely to me that your lab has a -4 log cut-off for PCRU which I believe does not measure low enough.  You were probably just a hair under .01% when the lab called it PCRU.  So that would not be a 2 log increase as you suggested -- maybe just over 1 log.  Still roughly on the edge of MMR. 

 

You only have the e14a2 (b3a2) breakpoint, which is the most common one. 

 

The mutation test could not be performed because it does not work below CCyR.  You are well below CCyR.  "Not found" is equivalent to BMB or FISH being negative.  If you had a kinase mutation the PCR would rise much more quickly, so I would forget about that.

 

Overall you seem to be plateaued or stalled out near MMR after being PCRU for about 6 months.  I assume the lab used has always been the same one.  Hovering near MMR is not necessarily "bad" unless the loss of response continues.  But it is understandable that your Onc would like to have you switch drugs.  I might be inclined to try Tasigna if I were in this situation. 

 

I do not have a recommendation for an Onc in Charlotte.  But I also do not know what another one would do for you.  The only option would be a drug change, and you can do that now if you want.  If you do not want to switch, but the current Onc insists, you could change Oncs if it means that much to stay with Sprycel.  I do not think there is a wrong answer as long as you do not lose CCyR, so it is just a decision you need to make to switch or not.



#4 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 21 June 2016 - 03:38 PM

My lab actually reports 3 decimal places. The report I am looking at has December at 0.000%, April at 0.122% and June 0.190% so will that make a difference in your response? Also do you think there is any problem with waiting a few months and having another BCR/ABL test before switching?
Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#5 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 21 June 2016 - 09:30 PM

No difference in my response.  I don't think waiting for another PCR cycle is a problem, but I also think you have enough trend info to make a decision now if you want.  It just looks like a change is needed, even if not urgent.



#6 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 21 June 2016 - 10:10 PM

CML2012, sorry to hear again about your increasing PCR.  Others who have experienced similar resistance to first and second-line TKIs seem to eventually find success with 300mg of Bosulif (possibly 200mg initially to test your tolerance).  Chriskuo might be a good person to talk to: I think he has been on Bosulif the longest.  I think Mbrown is also on Bosulif.  Perhaps they can advise you.  

 

Do a search on Bosulif http://community.lls...h&fromMainBar=1


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#7 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 19 July 2016 - 02:23 PM

Ok I was undetectable for 9 months then it was 0.04%, 0.122%, 0.19%. Today I got my last result 0.176% so slightly down. At least I am still not going up. I did not switch TKIs. I have been dealing with a lot of stress so maybe that is why I had the slight jump. We are just going to watch this for a while.
Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users