Jump to content


Photo

PCRU but low Hemoglobin - BMB necessary?


  • Please log in to reply
8 replies to this topic

#1 ROM1212

ROM1212

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 3 posts

Posted 24 May 2011 - 10:26 PM

Hey gang.

PCRU since April 2009.  Went in for my usual CBC today and for the first time my Onc used my low Hemoglobin nos. as a reason to perform a BMB.  She said this was necessary to further look into my low nos.

My Hemoglobin going back to 2009 has consistently been in the range of 12.3-12.5.  So if I am PCRU, and Hemoglobin has been steady, albeit low, I don't see the necessity of doing a BMB.  Unless the cancer center is looking for ways to fund their recently completed expansion/remodel?

Is a BMB necessary?  I say no.

Thanks for your input.



#2 hannibellemo

hannibellemo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 728 posts
  • LocationNorth Central Iowa

Posted 25 May 2011 - 06:17 AM

Many of us would love to have your Hgb! I would not consider this a reason to have a BMB. How many BMBs have you had since 2009? I am MMR and will have my 3rd in 3+ years in Feb. 2012; I don't consider that excessive. It will be interesting to hear what others think.

Pat


Pat

 

"You can't change the direction of the wind but you can adjust your sails."

DX 12/08; Gleevec 400mg; liver toxicity; Sprycel 100mg.; CCyR 4/10; MMR 8/10; Pleural Effusion 2/12; Sprycel 50mg. Maintaining MMR; 2/15 PCRU; 8/16 drifting in and out of undetected like a wave meeting the shore. Retired 12/23/2016! 18 months of PCRU, most recent at Mayo on 7/25/17 was negative at their new sensitivity reporting of 0.003.<p>


#3 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 25 May 2011 - 09:51 AM

BMB is not considered necessary after CCyR (negative FISH, negative BMB cytogenetics, or -2 log PCR) unless there is a significant change is status such as loss of CCyR.



#4 hannibellemo

hannibellemo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 728 posts
  • LocationNorth Central Iowa

Posted 25 May 2011 - 01:40 PM

Excellent! Is there a paper or something I can site when I relay this info to my onc?

Pat


Pat

 

"You can't change the direction of the wind but you can adjust your sails."

DX 12/08; Gleevec 400mg; liver toxicity; Sprycel 100mg.; CCyR 4/10; MMR 8/10; Pleural Effusion 2/12; Sprycel 50mg. Maintaining MMR; 2/15 PCRU; 8/16 drifting in and out of undetected like a wave meeting the shore. Retired 12/23/2016! 18 months of PCRU, most recent at Mayo on 7/25/17 was negative at their new sensitivity reporting of 0.003.<p>


#5 CallMeLucky

CallMeLucky

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationCT

Posted 25 May 2011 - 03:38 PM

You can download NCCN treatment guidelines here http://www.nccn.org/..._guidelines.asp

Page 10 defines Monitoring for patients receiving TKI Therapy

Take note of the following sections

Diagnosis of CML

  • Bone marrow cytogenetics and measurement of BCR-ABL transcript numbers by QPCR before intiation of treatment.
  • If collection of BM is not feasible, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) on a PB speciment using dual probes for the BCL and ABL genes is an acceptable method of confirming the diagnosis of CML.

Treatment Response

  • BCR-ABL transcript levels should be measured every 3 mo.
  • Bone marrow cytogenetics at 6 and 12 mo from initiation of therapy.  If complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) at 6 mo. it is not necessary to repeat bone marrow cytogenetics at 12 mo.
  • Bone marrow cytogenetics at 18 months if patient is not in a CCyR at 12 mo.

Complete Cytogenetic Response

  • BCR-ABL transcript level should be measured every 3-6 mo.
  • Bone marrow cytogenetics as clinically indicated.

Page 46 goes on to say a bone marrow test should be done for the following indications

  • At diagnosis to establish the stage.  If collection of bone marrow is not feasible, FISH on a peripheral blood specimen using dual probes for the BCR and ABL gene is an acceptable method of confirming diagnosis of CML.
  • At 6, 12, 18 month from intiation of therapy to assess response to TKI therapy.  If a CCyR is acheived at either of the earlier time points, then cytogenetics do not need to be repeated.
  • Rising levels of BCR-ABL transcript (1 log increase) without a MMR.

Date  -  Lab  -  Scale  -  Drug  -  Dosage MG  - PCR
2010/Jul -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 1.2%
2010/Oct -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.25%
2010/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.367%
2011/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.0081%
2011/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2011/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.00084%
2011/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.004%
2012/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2013/Jan -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  50-60-70  - 0%
2013/Mar -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  60-70  - 0%
2013/Apr -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.036%
2013/May -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.046%
2013/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.0239%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0192%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0034%
2013/Oct -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0054%
2014/Jan -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0093%
2014/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.013%
2014/Apr -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0048%
2014/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2014/Nov -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.047%
2014/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0228%
2016/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Dec - Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  100 - 0%
 

 


#6 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 26 May 2011 - 09:16 AM

Bravo.



#7 GerryL

GerryL

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 0 posts

Posted 26 May 2011 - 06:42 PM

Hi Pat,

I just got to MMR and I'm only having PCR blood tests now - not due for another one till October, 4 weeks before my appointment.

I did ask the doc if the blood test indicated lower levels of BCR-ABL than a BMB - he said that was correct.

Gerry



#8 hannibellemo

hannibellemo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 728 posts
  • LocationNorth Central Iowa

Posted 26 May 2011 - 09:01 PM

Thanks, Lucky, that's a great source! And, GerryL for the info!


Pat

 

"You can't change the direction of the wind but you can adjust your sails."

DX 12/08; Gleevec 400mg; liver toxicity; Sprycel 100mg.; CCyR 4/10; MMR 8/10; Pleural Effusion 2/12; Sprycel 50mg. Maintaining MMR; 2/15 PCRU; 8/16 drifting in and out of undetected like a wave meeting the shore. Retired 12/23/2016! 18 months of PCRU, most recent at Mayo on 7/25/17 was negative at their new sensitivity reporting of 0.003.<p>


#9 hwccritch

hwccritch

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 0 posts

Posted 25 August 2011 - 09:49 PM

I would question the need for BMB if your other critical blood values are normal






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users