Jump to content


Photo

TKI Drug Development Progress: ABL001 -- Low Side Effects?

ABL001tki drug combo tki resistance

  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#21 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 27 April 2016 - 09:57 AM

Ignore my last question. I read through the study again and it appears to only be open to people that have lost response and/or have a mutation.

 

I see the following listed:

Accepts Healthy Volunteers:  

No

 

So I guess they are not yet at the point where they are doing studies on new patients or healthy patients.

 

Sorry for my lack of patience. I need them to develop a cure yesterday. I have a 13 year old and it is obvious he will need to be taken care of his entire life... I don't recall being so stubborn at 13... :) my parents may disagree. ;)


10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#22 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 27 April 2016 - 10:14 AM

As part of the trial, they are also looking at patients taking only ABL001.  This may come after response, not sure as I don't have the details.  Also, if you are having too many issues with side effects of current medications you may qualify for the trial.  

 

No mention of this being a cure but it appears to work better than current TKI's and has less side affects.  My hope is that people who take it can eventually discontinue the use and have better results in staying off the drug than current drugs.


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#23 Lynne D

Lynne D

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • LocationNew York

Posted 17 May 2017 - 09:18 PM

I have been in the ABL001 trial since April 2015. I had been on Gleevec, Tasigna, back to Gleevec then Sprycel. I developed a mutation (f317l) and I was the first patient of Dr. Mauro's first Clinical Trial at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. I had never been in MMR before, I started ABL001 on my 10 year cancerversary, and I was immediately undetectable and am still undetectable 25 months later. I have less side effects than any other TKI. I started on 200mg twice a day. I lowered to 150 twice a day due to high blood pressure brought on by a bout of rhabdomyolsis because they started me on Crestor, abl001 and a workout in the gym. I was hospitalized for a week. Then they reformulated from capsules into pills so the dosage changed and I am currently on 160 mg twice a day. I hope this helps anyone. I also have a facebook group dedicated to ABL001. The link is below if anyone is interested. 

 

Thanks

Lynne

 

https://www.facebook...53028488228609/


Lynne Dagata

ldagata65@gmail.com

 

"Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue. Realize the strength, move on" ~~ Henry Rollins


#24 gerry

gerry

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,036 posts

Posted 17 May 2017 - 10:58 PM

Thanks Lynne - great to hear outcomes of this drug. :-)



#25 TeddyB

TeddyB

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts

Posted 18 May 2017 - 07:11 AM

Encouraging indeed.

 

If the trials go well, does anyone know when ABL001 is expected to "hit the market"?

And who will get it? Only those who do not respond to the other TKI`s or everyone?

I also have a feeling it is going to cost a lot?



#26 kat73

kat73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 884 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC area

Posted 18 May 2017 - 03:37 PM

This is so exciting!  An actual person who is on this and getting great results!  Thank you SO much, Lynne, for reporting in and congratulations on this tremendous success!  Please keep filling us in here, as not all of us (well, maybe I'm the last person on Earth?) don't do Facebook.  Best, best wishes for your continued well-being!

 

TeddyB's questions are pertinent:  Is the first opened-up cohort going to only include those who've failed the main TKIs or have a recognizable mutation?  Or will they include the rest of us?  How about turtles?  I would certainly bet it will be super expensive.  And, WHEN?????


Dx July 2009 on routine physical.  WBC 94.  Started Gleevec 400 mg Sept 2009.  MMR at 2yrs.  Side effects (malaise, depression/anxiety, fatigue, nausea, periorbital edema) never improved.  Kidney issues developed because of Gleevec.  Switched to Sprycel 70 mg in Aug 2011.  Above side effects disappeared or improved.  Have been MR3.5 - 4.5 ever since.  Two untreated pleural effusions followed by one treated by stopping Sprycel Jan 2017.  After 9 weeks, PCR showed loss of MMR; re-started Sprycel at 50 mg and in 3 months was back to <0.01% IS.  Pleural effusion returned within a couple of months, same as before (moderate, left side only).  Stopped Sprycel 50 mg for 12 weeks; pleural effusion resolved.  At about a monthoff the drug, PCR was 0.03; at 11 weeks it was 2.06 - lost CCyR? Have returned to 50 mg Sprycel for 3 weeks, intending to reduce to 20 mg going forward.


#27 chriskuo

chriskuo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts

Posted 19 May 2017 - 12:46 AM

In the US, the brand name drugs all cost about the same. A new drug will likely come in at about the same price
($120K-$140K) as all of the others on patent. Price is not a differentiator in the US. In other countries,
it can be because the governments negotiate lower drug prices individually with drug companies.

In the US, pricing with the insurance / PBM middlemen is a black box. They get a 30-40% discount on average
from the prices that are bandied about, but these discounts are kept secret as proprietary information.

#28 chriskuo

chriskuo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts

Posted 19 May 2017 - 12:50 AM

I would assume that it would not be approved for first-line use, unless clinical trials are run on that
patient population. Does anybody know if that is happening or is scheduled to happen?

Since it is additional expense for the drug company, they may want to get the money flowing from second-line use
before they take the next step.

#29 Sandrea

Sandrea

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts
  • LocationRussia, Siberia, Novosibirsk

Posted 19 May 2017 - 05:59 AM

Expanded Phase 1 Study of ABL001, a Potent, Allosteric Inhibitor of BCR-ABL, Reveals Significant and Durable Responses in Patients with CML-Chronic Phase with Failure of Prior TKI Therapy
58th ASH Annual Meeting & Exposition,  San Diego, CA  December 3-6, 2016


Diagnosed 1 April 2015. WBC 86000; b2a2 (p210) transcript 
on Hydrea for 2 months, then generic Gleevec 400mg (06/06/15)
CCyR in April 2016
 
12/22/2016  PCR:  0.49% (IS)           18 Month
03/29/2017  PCR:  0.68% (not IS)     21 Month
06/06/2017  PCR:  1.62% (not IS)     24 Month
06/20/2017  increased dose of imatinib to 600mg
10/30/2017  PCR:  0.15% (not IS)     28 Month
 

#30 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 19 May 2017 - 06:11 AM

It will still be a while before this drug hits the shelves, maybe 3 to 5 years.  

 

http://www.medicinen...articlekey=9877

 

If the drug shows curative abilities (which Novartis has speculated) it could get to market faster and be used as a first line drug (insurance companies are always looking to save money) but my guess is that the cost will double (at least), just look at the cost of some of the more recent drug therapies for other types of cancer for an example.


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#31 TeddyB

TeddyB

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts

Posted 30 May 2017 - 05:08 AM

Whether it will be first, second or third line, its always good to have more options, and hopefully this will have less side effects than the other TKI`s :)

 

Will be interesting to follow ABL001 progressions towards market.



#32 Lynne D

Lynne D

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • LocationNew York

Posted 13 November 2017 - 12:52 AM

A little update from Dr. Mauro's first ABL001 Patient001  :D He calls me his ABL001 Poster Person. I was started on the max dose of 200 2x a day. As per my own body's ways, I always develop side effects as years go on. I've had a few seizures on Sprycel and 2 on ABL001. Not sure if it's related and I don't think I really care, I just want to know for sure. I have minor bone "humming" and folliculitis starting again. ALL MINOR considering where I came from on 6 horrible years on Gleevec, 4 toxic months on Tasigna and 4 decent years on Sprycel before mutation. All in all, I am happy with this drug. I wish it could be once a day, which is part of the trial just not my part. My Dr. is hoping to get a trial within the trial and I hope he is succesful. It is a STOP trial. I've never been undetectable ever and now it will be 3 years in April. It isn't within the guidelines to have a trial within a trial I believe, but I'd be willing to try it. I never thought I would but I'd give it a whirl.

 

They are planning a combo trial with Bosulif also and currently doing combos with Gleevec. I'm thinking they are about 2 years from FDA approval. The ABL001 straight trial, no combo, is closed unless it's a compassionate case. I've been very happy with ABL001 and I think it is going to make a huge difference. The way it works is different than the other tki's.  I am attaching the link to the slides to Dr Mauro's webinar back in September. He also used many of the slides at the New York City/New Jersey Conference at the Grand Hyatt this month. Very informative. I will continue to keep you all posted.  :D  :D  :D

 http://www.lls.org/s...gram Slides.pdf


Lynne Dagata

ldagata65@gmail.com

 

"Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue. Realize the strength, move on" ~~ Henry Rollins


#33 chriskuo

chriskuo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 367 posts

Posted 13 November 2017 - 03:59 AM

 In Dr Mauro's presentation, I see a slide about a trial of ABL001 vs Bosulif.  Have you seen or heard information about a combo trial of the two?



#34 tiredblood

tiredblood

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 474 posts

Posted 13 November 2017 - 02:53 PM

I️ asked my doctor and he guesstimated about 2 years for FDA approval as well. Thanks for the update and also your participation in the trial. Please keep us posted.

#35 Lynne D

Lynne D

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 13 posts
  • LocationNew York

Posted 20 November 2017 - 01:56 PM

 In Dr Mauro's presentation, I see a slide about a trial of ABL001 vs Bosulif.  Have you seen or heard information about a combo trial of the two?

 

Dr. Mauro isn't crazy about that combo trial. He is most likely going to take another path in his clinical trials. If anyone here is in Manhattan on Dec 16, I am having a "connections" meeting for CML patients and their caregivers. It is for another non-profit organization but it's very small and not competition for LLS. I am going to have more info on the trials going on. Hopefully, Dr. Mauro will able to stop by. If you are interested just sign up here https://www.eventbri...ets-40094189801

 

I hope that doesn't get me booted, we are all just trying to help each other. 


Lynne Dagata

ldagata65@gmail.com

 

"Scar tissue is stronger than regular tissue. Realize the strength, move on" ~~ Henry Rollins


#36 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 29 January 2018 - 11:13 PM

Bump.


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users