Jump to content


Photo

TKI Drug Development Progress: ABL001 -- Low Side Effects?

ABL001tki drug combo tki resistance

  • Please log in to reply
35 replies to this topic

#1 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 10 May 2015 - 01:46 PM

A CML TKI drug being developed called ABL001 is worth watching.  This TKI drug, if it works, will target more specifically just ABL (as in BCR-ABL), so the side effects caused by current TKI drugs which inhibit more than BCR-ABL would be significantly reduced.  This is what I have long asked about: why can't we have a drug that simply targets the BCR-ABL more specifically rather than live with the side effects of also targeting c-KIt, PDGFR, SRC, etc, etc?  Maybe we will finally get a drug with minimal side effects, which would also have minimal long-term secondary impact on the body.  This would make ABL001 a great long term maintenance drug. 

 

ABL001 is being tested for use in TKI combo therapy along with Tasigna to overcome resistance, which shows promise.  Since ABL001 fits into a different part of the BCR-ABL than other CML TKI drugs, the resistance caused by losing effectiveness in the one TKI pocket would be overcome by ABL001 in the secondary TKI pocket.  It would also overcome T315i and other difficult kinase mutations.

 

http://journals.lww....Heavily.11.aspx

 

https://www.nibr.com...ne-target-twice

 

If ABL001 works, it is something that is very much needed for both initial TKI combo therapy -- which would yield a faster, deeper response -- and would also serve as a long term "mild" TKI maintenance drug.

 

I like this a lot.  Hope it works out.

 

Clinical trials are recruiting world-wide:

https://clinicaltria...how/NCT02081378


Edited by Trey, 14 September 2016 - 04:29 PM.


#2 DebDoodah22

DebDoodah22

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 110 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 10 May 2015 - 06:21 PM

Good news, indeed! Thanks for sharing this...hope it develops as anticipated.

#3 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 10 May 2015 - 07:42 PM

A CML TKI drug being developed called ABL001 is worth watching.  This TKI drug, if it works, will target more specifically just ABL (as in BCR-ABL), so the side effects caused by current TKI drugs which inhibit more than BCR-ABL would be significantly reduced.  This is what I have long asked about: why can't we have a drug that simply targets the BCR-ABL more specifically rather than live with the side effects of also targeting c-KIt, PDGFR, SRC, etc, etc?  Maybe we will finally get a drug with minimal side effects, which would also have minimal long-term secondary impact on the body.  This would make ABL001 a great long term maintenance drug. 

 

ABL001 is being tested for use in TKI combo therapy along with Tasigna to overcome resistance, which shows promise.  Since ABL001 fits into a different part of the BCR-ABL than other CML TKI drugs, the resistance caused by losing effectiveness in the one TKI pocket would be overcome by ABL001 in the secondary TKI pocket.  It would also overcome T315i and other difficult kinase mutations.

 

https://www.nibr.com...ne-target-twice

 

If ABL001 works, it is something that is very much needed for both initial TKI combo therapy -- which would yield a faster, deeper response -- and would also serve as a long term "mild" TKI maintenance drug.

 

I like this a lot.  Hope it works out.

 

Clinical trials are recruiting world-wide:

https://clinicaltria...how/NCT02081378

 

United States, Texas University of Texas/MD Anderson Cancer Center UT MD Anderson Not yet recruiting Houston, Texas, United States, 77030-4009 Contact: Rachel Abramowicz    713-794-5783    rrabramo@mdanderson.org    Principal Investigator: Jorge E. Cortes

 

I will be at M.D. Anderson tomorrow. But then again - this is a trial for Novartis - no doubt they want Tasigna paired, not a competitor's drug. 


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#4 shaynalee

shaynalee

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts

Posted 10 May 2015 - 08:46 PM

This is great news! Gives us all hope for a long and "normal"-ish life! I would love for my hubby, and everyone here, to be able to treat this condition with fewer side effects.

#5 Billie Murawski

Billie Murawski

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 711 posts
  • LocationErie,Pa

Posted 10 May 2015 - 10:38 PM

WoW, Just knowing something like that is in the works is a great Mothers Day Gift.  Thanks Trey!



#6 alexamay09

alexamay09

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 50 posts

Posted 11 May 2015 - 02:29 AM

Though it could be a long time before it filters through to the UK, this sounds very promising and it is encouraging that drugs are still being developed.  Fewer/milder 'side effects' would be a dream.

 

Thanks for letting us know Trey.

 

Alex



#7 Pin

Pin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 202 posts

Posted 11 May 2015 - 03:30 AM

Exciting news for all of us! I'd love to hear updates if anyone is eligible for the trial.

Diagnosed 9 June 2011, Glivec 400mg June 2011-July 2017, Tasigna 600mg July 2017-present (switched due to intolerable side effects, and desire for future cessation attempt).

Commenced monthly testing when MR4.0 lost during 2012.

 

2017: <0.01, <0.01, 0.005 (200mg Glivec, Adelaide) <0.01, 0.001 (new test sensitivity)

2016: <0.01, <0.01, PCRU, 0.002 (Adelaide)

2015: <0.01, <0.01, <0.01, 0.013

2014: PCRU, <0.01, <0.01, <0.01, <0.01

2013: 0.01, 0.014, 0.016, 0.026, 0.041, <0.01, <0.01 

2012: <0.01, <0.01, 0.013, 0.032, 0.021

2011: 38.00, 12.00, 0.14


#8 August1

August1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 69 posts

Posted 11 May 2015 - 08:03 AM

Great to hear. Thanks for sharing, Trey. 



#9 Yougotafriend

Yougotafriend

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts

Posted 11 May 2015 - 10:33 AM

Thanks for the info Trey sounds good

#10 TeddyB

TeddyB

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts

Posted 11 May 2015 - 11:34 AM

If Trey is excited, then im excited (that probably didnt sound to good)

 

From some of the studies on mice, they seemed to have stopped the combo therapy after a few months, and the mice did not relapse, would this maybe work on humans as well? (ABL001 + Nilotinib/Tasigna combo targeting/killing the stem cells for a lasting cure?)

 

 

"Single agent dosing regimens led to tumor regressions; however, despite continuous dosing, all tumors relapsed within 30-60 days with evidence of point mutations in the resistant tumors. In contrast, animals treated with the combination of ABL001 and nilotinib achieved sustained tumor regression with no evidence of disease relapse either during the 70 days of treatment or for > 150 days after treatment stopped."

 

 

 

Side effect wise, would this mean that the sharts and the queasiness would go away, maybe the fatigue, tinnitus, bone pain, muscle pain etc etc etc etc etc? (We will find out when the trials start, but feel free to guess  B)



#11 Gail's

Gail's

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 634 posts

Posted 11 May 2015 - 09:47 PM

TeddyB what tumors is your quote talking about? Was it tested on a different cancer than cml? It would be a godsend for us if it works on cml.
Diagnosed 1/15/15
FISH 92%
BMB 9:22 translocation
1/19/15 began 400 mg gleevec
1/22/15 bcr 37.2 IS
2/6/15 bcr 12.5 IS
3/26/15 bcr 10.3 IS
6/29/15 bcr 7.5 IS
9/24/15 bcr 0.8 IS
1/4/16 bcr 0.3 IS
Started 100 mg dasatinib, mutation analysis negative
4/20/16 bcr 0.03 IS
8/8/16 bcr 0.007 IS
12/6/16 bcr 0.002 IS
Lowered dasatinib to 70 mg
4/10/17 bcr 0.001 IS
Lowered dasatinib to 50 mg
7/5/17 bcr 0.004 IS
8/10/17 bcr 0.001. Stopped TKI in prep for September surgery.
9/10/17 bcr 0.006
10/10/17 bcr 0.088

#12 TeddyB

TeddyB

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 203 posts

Posted 12 May 2015 - 08:08 AM

I am not sure about tumors in CML, i think i once read about tumors in blast phase CML, but i am not sure, maybe someone else can answer that.

 

Gail: Here is the paper: https://ash.confex.c...Paper76344.html



#13 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 12 May 2015 - 02:12 PM

Leukemia is sometimes called a "liquid tumor", which is the case here.



#14 winespritzer

winespritzer

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 101 posts

Posted 10 June 2015 - 08:51 AM

Dear Trey,

Hope this happens really fast.

Thank you.

Wiunespritzer


CML History....

DX-1/14....wbc....55....100mg Sprycel-1 wk after DX....periorbital edema, fatigue,

.385-4/14

.365-7/14

.13-10/14

.11-1/15

.045-4/15

.07-7/15

.06-10/15

.04-1/16

0.00- 4/16-10/17

 

70mg Sprycel...11/4/17....40 mg prednisone (7 days)....thoracentisis...10/26/17

tremendous reduction w periorbital edema and fatigue


#15 Yougotafriend

Yougotafriend

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 20 posts

Posted 31 August 2015 - 08:35 PM

Sounds great hope it's out soon :)

#16 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 09 December 2015 - 01:38 PM

I once worked for Novartis, getting this to market will be a long time if it gets through Human trials.  Until that day, we still have our current medication keeping us alive (thankful of that!) and will continue to hope that the cure is just around the corner.  :)


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#17 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 27 April 2016 - 06:18 AM

It appears that they are now taking patients and pairing them with all first and second gen drugs:  

 

 

 

Drug: ABL001
Drug: ABL001 + Nilotinib
Drug: ABL001+imatinib
Drug: ABL001+dasatinib

 

https://clinicaltria...how/NCT02081378

 

Also recruiting all over the US and Internationally, anyone on these boards in the trials (if allowed to say so)?  


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#18 Tucker1

Tucker1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 27 April 2016 - 08:45 AM

I recently had a consult with Dr. Druker at OHSU. He is involved in the trial there he said it was going very wiell and said it only affected 2enzymes not the 60 or more affected by others. He suggested the trial for me as one of my options if Bousitinib doesn't work or side effects are too much. It is great news.
Dx: 11/2004 intermediate risk 400 mg Gleevec
11/2005 partial cytogenetic response PCR 6.3
Clinical trial Sprycel 50mg 2x daily 12/05
11/06 PCR weak positive
10/07 PCR undetectable
12/08 PCR .017
Recurring colitis from Sprycel
11/09 Tasigna PCR .0075 200 mg 2x daily
11/10 PCR .078 400 mg 2x daily
11/11PCR weak positive
2/12 PCR. .15 decrease 200 mg 2x (QT prolongation)
Dosage changes until 2015 QT recurrent PCR .004
7/15 bosulif 500 mg
Liver toxicity discontinued bosulif PCR .025
Restart bosulif 100mg
12/15 PCR .714
Increase bosulif slowly
2/16 PCR.5
5/16 PCR .000 bosuitinib 400mg
8/16 PCR .027 Bosuitinib 300mg
10/16 PCR .117 Bosuitinib 300mg
1/17 PCR .243 Bousitinib 300mg
4/17 PCR .403

#19 Harper3994

Harper3994

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts
  • LocationTrinity, Florida

Posted 27 April 2016 - 09:13 AM

My doctor at Moffitt in Tampa has mentioned this to me. Did not go into detail but said in July when I reach the 1 year Mark we will talk. I am hopeful maybe I can be part of this.

#20 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 27 April 2016 - 09:47 AM

I am trying to wrap my head around this. In the trials it looks like you take the ABL001 with another TKI. If you already have a good response from one TKI why would we take two TKIs. What would the benefit be. If you already PCRU why add another TKI? Or is this only if your not getting a good response? Are there any trials where all you take is ABL001?


10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users