Jump to content


Photo

Novartis discount sways NICE toward Tasigna


  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 CallMeLucky

CallMeLucky

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationCT

Posted 18 August 2011 - 11:43 AM

Some interesting politics at play, especially about the high dose Gleevec.  Nonetheless, still a win for UK CMLr's.  Hopefully they will come to a similar agreement with BMS on Sprycel.

http://www.fiercepha...igna/2011-08-18

Novartis discount sways NICE toward Tasigna
August 18, 2011 — 9:44am ET | By Tracy Staton

The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence has taken Novartis ($NVS) up on its offer of a discount on Tasigna. The cost-effectiveness watchdog gave Tasigna a preliminary thumbs-up as a second-line treatment in leukemia for patients who stop responding to the previous-generation Novartis drug Glivec, which is sold as Gleevec in the U.S.

Just exactly what that discount offer entailed isn't clear, as Novartis won't say. InPharm speculates the Tasigna discount would be somewhere in the neighborhood of 10%, given the terms of previous patient-access pricing schemes. The drug costs about £30,000 a year, or more than $49,000.

Sign up for our FREE newsletter for more news like this sent to your inbox!

Whatever it is, the cost cut was enough to put Tasigna over the top. NICE had previously determined the drug was effective at treating patients with Glivec-resistant disease, as well as those who could no longer tolerate the older therapy. But the price put the cost-effectiveness balance out of whack. NICE considered Bristol-Myers Squibb's ($BMY) Sprycel equally effective, but that drug still lacks NICE's recommendation. BMS has said it will appeal the agency's decision.

The new draft guidance further notes Novartis has hiked the price of its high-dose form of Glivec, pushing the cost per patient above £40,000. Needless to say, the agency decided not to recommend the higher dose, InPharm reports.


Date  -  Lab  -  Scale  -  Drug  -  Dosage MG  - PCR
2010/Jul -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 1.2%
2010/Oct -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.25%
2010/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.367%
2011/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.0081%
2011/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2011/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.00084%
2011/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.004%
2012/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2013/Jan -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  50-60-70  - 0%
2013/Mar -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  60-70  - 0%
2013/Apr -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.036%
2013/May -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.046%
2013/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.0239%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0192%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0034%
2013/Oct -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0054%
2014/Jan -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0093%
2014/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.013%
2014/Apr -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0048%
2014/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2014/Nov -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.047%
2014/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0228%
2016/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Dec - Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  100 - 0%
 

 


#2 CDW

CDW

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 18 August 2011 - 12:53 PM

just had an email from a family member on the same subject. It's great news for those in the UK, as there was no apparent alternative if Gleevec failed (per NHS/NICE guidleines and notwithstanding government cancer drugs fund). I sincerely hope BMS follow suit with dasatinib to give more options - as we all know Tasigna does not agree with everyone and can be quite rough on the body. The intersting point about NICE's reversal was that they previously stated there was insufficient proven benefit of the drug - they use a formula called "qaulity of additional life years". It is apparent the benefit of the drug was being traded against cost, and not being thought of purely in terms of proven benefit.

good news for UK CMLers!

Chris






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users