Jump to content


Photo

My 3-month checkup, and a question about pathology at diagnosis.


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Taylor

Taylor

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 11 May 2011 - 11:35 AM

I went to my 3-month check-up today.  I was dx on 1/31/11 with 230,000 WBC.  I started Tasigna (300mg twice a day) a week later and within a month my doctor told me I was in CHR.  I've been doing bi-monthly blood tests.  Today he told me everything, including liver enzymes, were great.  In fact, I did not even ask for my WBC (I'll ask later).  Typically I've been in the 5,500 range, although 2 weeks ago I was about 6,800, no biggie.  I'm now moving to getting a CBC only once a month.

Looks like in 3 months we are going to check for PCR.  I'm pretty excited about this and VERY relieved--strange that it's hard to notice how worked up I've been until it's suddenly all gone. Very thankful for this, the great medicine, my onc, and the support and resources here.

I asked for my original path reports, because I only saw the non-FISH and cyogentic reports stating blast counts (2% in marrow, less than 1% in blood) and just that all visual signs point to CML.

These reports say I was considered chronic phase (obvious enough from the blasts).

Cytogenics say, "The obtained karotype listed blow is abnormal and shows a male karyotype with an abnormal clone.  20 of 20 inactive phase cells have the 9.22 location [I realize this is the Ph+].  46, XY, t(9;22) (q34;q11.2)[20].

FISH says, "...the abnormal BCR/ABL fusion product (gene) was identified in 195 of 202 nuclie (96.5%)."

I'm no expert but that all seems pretty normal to me for the original pathology, is that right?



#2 CallMeLucky

CallMeLucky

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationCT

Posted 11 May 2011 - 12:00 PM

Sounds like all the typical stuff.  Glad to hear you are doing well and starting to feel better.

Best of luck,


Date  -  Lab  -  Scale  -  Drug  -  Dosage MG  - PCR
2010/Jul -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 1.2%
2010/Oct -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.25%
2010/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.367%
2011/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.0081%
2011/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2011/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.00084%
2011/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.004%
2012/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2013/Jan -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  50-60-70  - 0%
2013/Mar -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  60-70  - 0%
2013/Apr -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.036%
2013/May -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.046%
2013/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.0239%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0192%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0034%
2013/Oct -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0054%
2014/Jan -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0093%
2014/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.013%
2014/Apr -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0048%
2014/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2014/Nov -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.047%
2014/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0228%
2016/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Dec - Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  100 - 0%
 

 


#3 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 11 May 2011 - 06:09 PM

Nothing unusual in that data.



#4 Taylor

Taylor

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 17 posts

Posted 12 May 2011 - 03:26 PM

Thanks guys!

Interestingly, they had some data from when I had a blood test on 12/29/08 because I was having a gallbladder problem (it ended up getting removed in March '09) and my WBC was 7.4.  Nothing extraordinary but just sort of interesting to know.



#5 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 12 May 2011 - 04:58 PM

Were the platelets also normal on the CBC a year earlier?  I had a blood test (CBC) done one year prior to diagnosis (emergency room visit) and although WBC was normal, my platelets were nearly 1 million (about 3X normal).  One year later WBC was 100K and platelets still about 1 million.  No one reviewed that ER CBC report until after my diagnosis a year later.  Anyway, this shows that very high platelets are often the first sign of CML even when WBC remains normal for quite a while longer.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users