Jump to content


Photo

Switch to LLS Community Site -- Promised Changes


  • Please log in to reply
71 replies to this topic

#21 tiredblood

tiredblood

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 474 posts

Posted 26 January 2018 - 11:07 PM

I'm gonna miss this. Sometimes I'd look back at my posts to get a timeline of my symptoms or side effects.
Will our signature line/CML history function still be available? The cessationist thread?

#22 tiredblood

tiredblood

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 474 posts

Posted 26 January 2018 - 11:23 PM

I've been on the community site and I just don't see myself participating there. Maybe I'll give it a try, but if I don't, I want to thank you all. Couldn't have navigated CML without you.
We're loosing all our PMs too, aren't we? Just copied the CD34- one where you explained my sleepwalking CD34-, Trey.

#23 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 26 January 2018 - 11:31 PM

I'm gonna miss this. Sometimes I'd look back at my posts to get a timeline of my symptoms or side effects.
Will our signature line/CML history function still be available? The cessationist thread?

There's a thing over there called "MY STORY".  You can access it by clicking on your user name at the top of the page, you will be delivered to the page with "MY STORY".  Come back to this forum and copy your signature.  Go back to the new forum and click on the big red "Edit my story" button toward the bottom.  Paste your info there and then click the "Save" button.

 

It's not exactly the signature thingy we have here, but it's easily accessible when someone clicks on your user name.

 

Hope this helps. :wacko:


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#24 Melanie

Melanie

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 219 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 27 January 2018 - 12:24 AM

So what happens to this forum? Who owns or controlls it? What happens to all the information and discussions? Once it goes offline, can someone re-start it? I don't understand how these things work!

I can't seem to get registered on the "Community". It just keeps saying my email or password is invalid...
Dx - 05/2011; PCR: 15.04; Fish: 87% Slow responder due to pancytopenia. Current - Bosulif - Nov: 2012, Mar 2016 lowered to 300 mg. 07/16 back to 400 mg. Clinical trial drug, Promacta, Feb 2013, for low Platelets.
CyCR - Aug 2014, Positive for 1 chromosome Sep 2015. PCR: 12.77 in Oct, 2012 to 0.04 (MDA) in Mar, 2016. 4/2016 - 0.126 (Local lab (IS); 05/2016 - 0.195 (local); 6/2016 - 0.07 (MDA); 7/2016 - 0.03 (local) 9/13/2016 - 0.16 (MDA); 9/26/2016 - 0.31 (MDA); 11/2016 - 0.012 (local); 01/2017 - 0.24 (MDA); 04/2017 - 0.09 (MDA); Cytogenetics show der(1:7)(q10;p10)7 chromosome mutation. Repeat of Sep 2015. PCR - 6/2017- 0.035 (local); 10/2017- 0.02 (MDA)

#25 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 27 January 2018 - 11:30 AM

So what happens to this forum? Who owns or controlls it? What happens to all the information and discussions? Once it goes offline, can someone re-start it? I don't understand how these things work!

I can't seem to get registered on the "Community". It just keeps saying my email or password is invalid...

I believe the LLS owns the data (words we've written over many years), and they lease the platform (software) that we use to input and retrieve said data with.  Technically, there is no reason that all of the discussions that are in this database couldn't be restored in the newer forum.  Hopefully they don't just delete the older stuff just out of convenience. :(


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#26 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 27 January 2018 - 12:35 PM

I received a nice response from Dr. Nichols on the impending changeover from this forum to the new community forum. She told me that they are very much listening to our concerns and making adjustments. They intend to carry over our discussion threads from 2016  Unfortunately, that leaves a lot of historical knowledge lost when the move takes place at the beginning of next month. 

 

I don't know if I will be as active on the new site as this one. Only time will tell. But it is a sure bet that this forum is coming to an end.

 

If anyone can suggest an alternate forum already up and running which is structured similarly to this one, I would be happy to check it out.

 

All the best to all - I have enjoyed learning and contributing with everyone here. I might even miss Trey.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#27 cmljax

cmljax

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 115 posts

Posted 27 January 2018 - 01:14 PM

I also heard from Dr. Nichols (see below) and I think we need to give LLS Community a chance before we find another.  The best I have found is the one in the UK, but it has differences from this forum and is not nearly as active. I am going to try my best to use LLS Community in the hopes that LLS will listen to us and continue to work with Trey to improve it. I am hopeful that this will happen. I am going to try LLS Community for a while and hope others on this forum will give it a shot as well.

 

 

Dr. Nichols:

Thanks very much for this email. All of us who have been heavy users of the Discussion Boards appreciate your concern for us and your willingness to work with us to improve LLS Community. No need for a call at this time as I think Trey can best represent the interests of the Discussion Board users.  I commit to you that I will use LLS Community and provide feedback to you as and if I think it is warranted.

 

Part of the issue is just getting used to something new, like a new phone. But part of the issue is certain formatting and functionality that exist in the Discussion Boards that does not exist or is limited in LLS Community.  Over time, I hope we can all work together to make LLS Community as good as if not better than the Discussion Boards.

 

Best regards and thanks again for your involvement in this issue,

Ted

From: Mission Communications <MissionCommunications@lls.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2018 12:27 PM
Subject: RE: Discussion Board Platform
 

Hi Ted,

 

Thank you for sharing this feedback. As Trey mentioned on the Discussion Boards, we have discussed this feedback further with him. We are listening.

 

Please know that LLS is seriously considering all this feedback and intends to continue to enhance LLS Community. In fact, LLS will be posting questions on LLS Community to members in the coming weeks to gather feedback about the platform, and hopes that you and other Discussion Board members will weigh in. LLS plans to make changes, based on user feedback, so that it can better suit the needs of members.

 

Unfortunately, there are ongoing and serious systems and technical problems with the Discussion Boards, outside of the control of LLS. Our hope is that you, and other members, will join LLS Community, so we can work together to enhance the platform while preserving this community as place where you can continue to give each other information and support.

 

Please know that we are here for you, and I am more than happy to set up a call with you to discuss this further.

 

Thank you,

Dr. Gwen Nichols

 

Gwen Nichols, M.D. Chief Medical Officer

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society | www.lls.org

 
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 10:06 AM
To: Mission Communications <MissionCommunications@lls.org>

Subject: Re: Discussion Board Platform

 

Thank you for this response Dr. Nichols.  Please allow me to share a very recent post from the Discussion Board by a guy named Trey who has been active on this board for over 10 years and incredibly helpful to all of us with CML who use this format/site. Here's what he said:

 

Give posts titles.  Add a title block.  Without titles it is just a jumbled mess.

 

The "Search" function only searches on the stuff posted by LLS, unless the user clicks another button,  Not very intuitive.

 

Must separate the Member posts from the LLS posts -- need separate sections of the site.  Sorry to say, the LLS posts are generally useless to us, and they take up a huge amount of space with all the graphics.  And most are just ads for drug companies. 

 

This Community site is mainly a "push site" where LLS pushes stuff toward us.  That is not what we want or need.  We want and need a place to communicate with each other, not have LLS push stuff at us.  The LLS stuff gets in the way of the stuff we care about, which is talking to each other.  Sorry, but we do not want to talk to LLS.  We actually know more about this disease than LLS does.  We should be treated accordingly.

 

If our old posts are migrated over it will be useless unless they are searchable.  This Community site does not currently do that.

 

Ditch the Medvizor graphics, if not all their stuff entirely.  They are spam to us.

 

We almost never had a spam problem on the other LLS site.  Justifying this new site as protecting us better from spam is misinformation.   If the issue is cost, LLS is paying way too much for the Community site since they are getting junk.

 

Please understand that these are not my words, but I do share many of Trey's sentiments - the Discussion Board is a true virtual support group and the community site is not.  I live in Jacksonville Florida and there is no live support group he just for CML.  Please keep the Discussion Board if at all possible.  Thanks and best regards,

Ted

 

 

From: Mission Communications <MissionCommunications@lls.org>
Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2018 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: Discussion Board Platform

 

Dear Ted,

 

We realize our Discussion Boards have become a place patients and caregivers rely on to find support and exchange information. We know how important this forum is for members, and are doing everything we can to preserve the discussions and aid in a smooth transition over to our new platform, LLS Community.

 

While we have relied on the technology for LLS Discussion Boards for many years, this technology no longer allows us to update the platform in a cost effective manner and maintain full control of its functions. Further, LLS Community better safeguards our community from inappropriate content and provides the ability to update the platform as technology evolves.

 

We truly appreciate your feedback regarding LLS Community. We will consider this, as well as feedback from other members, as we continue to enhance LLS Community.

 

Please feel free to respond with any additional questions or concerns.

 

Thank you,

Dr. Gwen Nichols

 

Gwen Nichols, M.D. Chief Medical Officer

The Leukemia & Lymphoma Society | www.lls.org

3 International Drive, Suite 200 | Rye Brook, NY 10573

 

 

 

 


Dx 9/26/16 WBC 28800; platelets 749; FISH 97% PCR 43%

Tasigna 600MG per day

October 2016                     PCR 22% IS

November 2016                 PCR 5.8% IS

December 2016                 PCR 0.1% IS  MMR!!

March 10, 2017                 PCR 0.006% IS  MR 4.22

Tasigna 450MG per day

April 5, 2017                      PCR <.003% IS

June 5, 2017                     PCR <.003% IS (dose reduction validated!!!)

Tasigna 300MG per day starting June 15, 2017

6-day drug break starting June 20, 2017 due to multiple AE's

July 24, 2017                     PCR <.003% IS

September 18, 2017          Negative, AKA PCRU

Tasigna 150mg per day starting 9/18/17

October 30, 2017               Negative

December 11, 2017           Negative


#28 Jan0080

Jan0080

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 51 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted 27 January 2018 - 01:48 PM

I too, received a note from Dr Nichols,  I am please that Scuba received a response from his note.  They are not just treating this as a PR issue.  I have requested a 60 day delay to solve our issues prior to pulling the plug.  I am glad that Trey is receiving appropriate feedback.


Diagnosed Dec 27, 2016 started Sprycel 100 mg Jan 7, 2017. Initial PCR 77.9 after 30 days 28.4, day 79 1.4 and day 115 0.1%. That is a 99.9% reduction! Sprycel 100 mg for 3 months, 80 mg for 1 month and now at 50 mg. Hooray for Sprycel!!! PCR June 5, 2017 0.04! Dose reduction to 40 mg 6/15/2017 due to shortness of breath. 20 mg as of June 29th. PCR .02 9/11/2017. PCR .015 IS as of 12/11/2017. Lungs substantially better. Low dose Sprycel works!

Adverse Effect - At about week 6 of Sprycel sharp muscle pain that would start at 2 AM and last for about 4 hours. This lasted about 4 weeks and went away, thank goodness.

#29 campanula

campanula

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts

Posted 27 January 2018 - 02:16 PM

I received a note from Gwen Nichols, too - there is a lot of cutting and pasting going on at the LLS right now. 

 

Last night I signed into the LLS Community.  RED FLAG:  to sign up, you have to give your name, e-mail address and birth date.  This will show up for anyone to see when they click on your name, unless you adjust privacy settings.  To do this, click on the "gear" icon next to your user name in the upper right hand corner, and choose "Privacy Settings."  Enter "LLS Researcher" as the only person who will be able to see all information.  (I would appreciate it if someone would let me know if they can ever see more than "campanula" and "diagnosed" on mine). 

 

I also signed up for https://www.cmlsupport.org.uk/forum/1 and plan to use both sites for awhile.


Dx 2/16: PCR = 59.4%

BMB showed second translocation.

400 mg generic Imatinib

5/16:  PCR = 0.88%

8/16: PCR = 0.04%

11/16 PCR = 0.01%

2/17 PCR < 0.01%

2/17 BMB results:  all translocations gone.

6/17 PCR = 0.03%

9/17 PCR = 0.01%

1/18 PCR = 0.01%

 

 


#30 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 27 January 2018 - 04:02 PM

Each of the individual posts on this discussion forum have a unique URL address which allows them to be linked to,  another feature that is sadly lacking on the LLS Community forum.  


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#31 M.A.

M.A.

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 55 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 27 January 2018 - 04:45 PM

So to sum up, although we want to work with LLS, they have chosen a crappy forum and not done user-testing on it.


CML diagnosed April 2016

Type One Diabetes diagnosed April 1980 (age 12)

 

BCR-ABL (IS)

46.77  April 2016

3.568  July 2016  

0.076  Oct 2016

0.016  Feb 2017

0.0079  April 2017

0.014  July 2017

0.019  Sept 2017

0.011  Nov 2017

0.019  Jan 2018

 

Sprycel

100mg April 29 - September 22

75mg  September 23 - October 28

50mg October 29 2016 to present


#32 tiredblood

tiredblood

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 474 posts

Posted 27 January 2018 - 05:11 PM

Thanks for the info RCK. Will take a look at it.

#33 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 27 January 2018 - 05:22 PM

Thanks for the info RCK. Will take a look at it.

Who's RCK, I thought?  Duh, it's me. :wacko:


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#34 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 27 January 2018 - 05:32 PM

I received a note from Gwen Nichols, too - there is a lot of cutting and pasting going on at the LLS right now. 

 

Last night I signed into the LLS Community.  RED FLAG:  to sign up, you have to give your name, e-mail address and birth date.  This will show up for anyone to see when they click on your name, unless you adjust privacy settings.  To do this, click on the "gear" icon next to your user name in the upper right hand corner, and choose "Privacy Settings."  Enter "LLS Researcher" as the only person who will be able to see all information.  (I would appreciate it if someone would let me know if they can ever see more than "campanula" and "diagnosed" on mine). 

 

I also signed up for https://www.cmlsupport.org.uk/forum/1 and plan to use both sites for awhile.

You did good! We can't see much about you over there. Your status level is: incognito! :ph34r: You may want to unfollow the CML group if you want to be more stealthy. You can still read the group, you just have to find a Chronic Myeloid Leukemia link and click on it.

 

This is pretty much all that can be seen about you:

 

campanula

Member since January 2018
 

Looks like campanula has no story yet.

User Info Groups

Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#35 campanula

campanula

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts

Posted 27 January 2018 - 05:55 PM

Thanks for the feedback, Kirk!  I'm dealing with some real trust issues right now... :unsure:  

 

Another strategy I have been deploying is to "print screen" some useful information from this old forum and send it to myself in an e-mail.  For example, I did that with my signature timeline - haven't decided if I want to share that on the new community yet.  So far, I am underwhelmed by this new option - but I'm trying to keep positive moving forward.

 

I have a feeling a lot of us might be losing touch with each other and I want to thank you all for such invaluable advice (and humor) these past two post-diagnosis years. 


Dx 2/16: PCR = 59.4%

BMB showed second translocation.

400 mg generic Imatinib

5/16:  PCR = 0.88%

8/16: PCR = 0.04%

11/16 PCR = 0.01%

2/17 PCR < 0.01%

2/17 BMB results:  all translocations gone.

6/17 PCR = 0.03%

9/17 PCR = 0.01%

1/18 PCR = 0.01%

 

 


#36 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 27 January 2018 - 07:07 PM

Thanks for the feedback, Kirk!  I'm dealing with some real trust issues right now... :unsure:  

 

Another strategy I have been deploying is to "print screen" some useful information from this old forum and send it to myself in an e-mail.  For example, I did that with my signature timeline - haven't decided if I want to share that on the new community yet.  So far, I am underwhelmed by this new option - but I'm trying to keep positive moving forward.

 

I have a feeling a lot of us might be losing touch with each other and I want to thank you all for such invaluable advice (and humor) these past two post-diagnosis years. 

I'm hoping we can keep our community together on the new platform, including all of our shared history contained in our posts.


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#37 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 27 January 2018 - 08:01 PM

All changes to Community are in the hands of Dr Saltzman.  I gave him my inputs by email and phone, and he is now working on changes.  He will migrate up to 3 years of old posts.  Some changes may appear sooner, but it may be weeks rather than days for most changes.  So in the meantime people need to migrate to Community.  Or go to one of these:

 

https://www.cmleukemia.com/forums.html


Edited by Trey, 27 January 2018 - 08:03 PM.


#38 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 28 January 2018 - 12:51 PM

Dr Saltzman will migrate up to 3 years of old posts. 

Migrating a volume of posts from this discussion forum, without the Invision software to navigate them, will only result in a wasted effort, and a large pile of garbage.   A better idea would be to leave this forum intact and searchable until the new forum reaches a level of capability where this forum is no longer needed.


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#39 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 28 January 2018 - 03:25 PM

Migrating a volume of posts from this discussion forum, without the Invision software to navigate them, will only result in a wasted effort, and a large pile of garbage.   A better idea would be to leave this forum intact and searchable until the new forum reaches a level of capability where this forum is no longer needed.

Buzz, that does seem to be a very reasonable idea.


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#40 IGotCML

IGotCML

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 57 posts
  • LocationDallas / Fort Worth, TX

Posted 28 January 2018 - 07:07 PM

Thanks for the feedback, Kirk!  I'm dealing with some real trust issues right now... :unsure:  

 

Another strategy I have been deploying is to "print screen" some useful information from this old forum and send it to myself in an e-mail.  For example, I did that with my signature timeline - haven't decided if I want to share that on the new community yet.  So far, I am underwhelmed by this new option - but I'm trying to keep positive moving forward.

 

I have a feeling a lot of us might be losing touch with each other and I want to thank you all for such invaluable advice (and humor) these past two post-diagnosis years. 

I am searching for pages in the forum that have information that is relevant to me and I am saving them on my PC as HTML webpages. Same idea as yours, just a different process.






2 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users