Jump to content


Photo

House Tax Bill Would Scrap Deduction For Medical Expenses


  • Please log in to reply
5 replies to this topic

#1 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 03 November 2017 - 04:49 PM

House Tax Bill Would Scrap Deduction For Medical Expenses

 

The tax bill unveiled by Republicans in the House on Thursday would not, as had been rumored, eliminate the tax penalty for failure to have health insurance. But it would eliminate a decades-old deduction for people with very high medical costs.

 

The controversial bill is an effort by Republicans to revamp the nation's tax code and provide dramatic tax cuts for business and individuals. However, its future is not yet clear because Republicans, who control both the House and Senate, appear divided on key measures.

 

The medical deduction, originally created in World War II, is available only to taxpayers whose expenses are above 10 percent of their adjusted gross income.

 

Because of that threshold, and because it is available only to people who itemize their deductions, the medical expense deduction is not used by many people - an estimated 8.8 million claimed it on their 2015 taxes, according to the IRS.

 

But those 8.8 million tax filers claimed an estimated $87 billion in deductions; meaning that those who do qualify for the deduction have very high out-of-pocket health costs.

 

Continue reading: https://khn.org/Nzg3Mjky


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#2 ROMO

ROMO

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 76 posts

Posted 05 November 2017 - 06:46 PM

Buzzml,
 
I am a solder to your passion.
The congress is working to separate
money from people. Take the people's money. 
For votes. That's what they do.
 
It don't matter their political persuasion.
That's what they Will do.
We get elections and think that we will change this.
We can't. We are a small number in the political game.
 
We are own doctors.
 
romo

DX August 2016. WBC ~160K
PH+ Cells 36%
No Spleen enlargement
No Symptoms. Other counts ~Normal
BCR-ABL p210 (Detected)
BCR-ABL p190 (Not Detected)
 
Sprycel 100mg.
PCR   02/01/2017    0.146 IS
PCR   08/07/2017    0.022 IS
Next PCR:           12/XX/2017
 

#3 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 06 November 2017 - 06:26 AM

Just curious, would millionaires or billionaires even bother with having health insurance or just pay out of pocket and then deduct using this method?  


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#4 cmljax

cmljax

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 115 posts

Posted 06 November 2017 - 11:19 AM

The proposed tax bill also lowers tax rates, so it will be a net benefit to some and a net negative to others depending on your taxable income.


Dx 9/26/16 WBC 28800; platelets 749; FISH 97% PCR 43%

Tasigna 600MG per day

October 2016                     PCR 22% IS

November 2016                 PCR 5.8% IS

December 2016                 PCR 0.1% IS  MMR!!

March 10, 2017                 PCR 0.006% IS  MR 4.22

Tasigna 450MG per day

April 5, 2017                      PCR <.003% IS

June 5, 2017                     PCR <.003% IS (dose reduction validated!!!)

Tasigna 300MG per day starting June 15, 2017

6-day drug break starting June 20, 2017 due to multiple AE's

July 24, 2017                     PCR <.003% IS

September 18, 2017          Negative, AKA PCRU

Tasigna 150mg per day starting 9/18/17

October 30, 2017               Negative

December 11, 2017           Negative


#5 Jan0080

Jan0080

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 51 posts
  • LocationLos Angeles

Posted 07 November 2017 - 06:21 PM

A am a CPA. My clientele are quite wealthy.

The major reduction in tax rates will go to those that earn the bulk of their income from pass through entities where the income does not come from personal service. This tax break will be huge for my clients earning in excess of $1 million per year. They are hoping to see their marginal rates drop from 39.6 to 25%.

The elimination of medical deductions will hurt those paying for round the clock caregivers the most. The elimination of state and local taxes will have a huge impact here in Los Angeles as well as the cap of $10,000 on property taxes. Here property taxes are almost always over $20,000 per year. Plus the mortgage interest deduction is being cut in halve for new mortgages (maximum mortgage will be $500,000 as opposed to the present $1 million) Here the most modest homes cost more than a million dollars. This will depress sales. I believe that there will be major changes to the proposal before it passes. Taxing University endowment funds is just another crazy change in this law that makes little sense. The new proposed law gets rid of very few current abuses such as the extremely wealthy individuals parking billions offshore or eliminating an estate tax that only kicks in for estates over $11 million. My opinion is that the new proposed law benefits the most generous Republican donors and gives crumbs to everyone else.
Diagnosed Dec 27, 2016 started Sprycel 100 mg Jan 7, 2017. Initial PCR 77.9 after 30 days 28.4, day 79 1.4 and day 115 0.1%. That is a 99.9% reduction! Sprycel 100 mg for 3 months, 80 mg for 1 month and now at 50 mg. Hooray for Sprycel!!! PCR June 5, 2017 0.04! Dose reduction to 40 mg 6/15/2017 due to shortness of breath. 20 mg as of June 29th. PCR .02 9/11/2017. PCR .015 IS as of 12/11/2017. Lungs substantially better. Low dose Sprycel works!

Adverse Effect - At about week 6 of Sprycel sharp muscle pain that would start at 2 AM and last for about 4 hours. This lasted about 4 weeks and went away, thank goodness.

#6 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 08 November 2017 - 02:49 PM

Thanks Jan, no surprises there.  :(


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users