
Just Diagnosed CML and anxious to begin journey
#1
Posted 04 October 2017 - 07:59 PM
Background:July went to PCP with upper and lower GI issues. pcp thought gallbladder possibly. Told me change diet and exercise. Also took blood for CBC, show WBC 20,000..two weeks changed diet etc lost 8lbs felt good but had WBC 22,000...waited two more weeks lost 7lbs felt better but WBC up to 26,000, reffered to Hemo/ONC but couldn't get seen til Sept 4th.had ultrasound of abdomen small gallstone but no issues, Spleen was showing 14cm but no pain or issues. continued monitoring cbc stayed the same lost 10lbs feeling good, all GI symptoms gone.. CBC done 9/4 wbc up to 32,000...9/4 Hurricane come through appt changed to 9/12..onc does cbc and test PH+..WBC 46000 and positive for cml.
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#2
Posted 04 October 2017 - 08:05 PM
10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)
Cancer Sucks!
#3
Posted 04 October 2017 - 08:08 PM
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#4
Posted 04 October 2017 - 10:14 PM
Fred aka Jan
Adverse Effect - At about week 6 of Sprycel sharp muscle pain that would start at 2 AM and last for about 4 hours. This lasted about 4 weeks and went away, thank goodness.
#5
Posted 04 October 2017 - 10:24 PM
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#6
Posted 04 October 2017 - 10:32 PM
While I don't know who the top Drs are there, it's a major metropolitan area which means there are good hospitals and good specialists. You actually are better with a younger Doc as Gleevec only was available 20 years ago and Tasigna and Sprycel have only been around for 10 years. You ARE allowed to ask your Onc how many patients does he/she have with CML? Freaking out won't help. Be self aware but you will be okay!
Adverse Effect - At about week 6 of Sprycel sharp muscle pain that would start at 2 AM and last for about 4 hours. This lasted about 4 weeks and went away, thank goodness.
#7
Posted 05 October 2017 - 01:57 AM
Has your onc indicated which drug he is going to prescribe?
Sprycel is definitely stronger than Gleevac but also has a higher risk of pleural effusion. I was started on Gleevac 7 years ago, shortly after Sprycel and Tasigna were becoming first-line options. I would probably still recommend starting with Gleevec to minimize the chance of a pleural effusion early in your treatment. However, if you slip behind in making complete cytogenetic response or major molecular response, there is no reason to delay switching.
If your onc does not specialize in CML, be prepared to request getting a second opinion from a specialist if you fall behind any benchmarks. I have tried all 5 approved drugs and finally found one that got me below MMR 5 years after dx with manageable side effects.
Hopefully, you will not be switching drugs because of side effects, but sometimes it is better to switch drugs than trying to manage difficult side effects.
#8
Posted 05 October 2017 - 05:23 AM
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#9
Posted 05 October 2017 - 08:06 AM
Jack - Welcome to the club you never wanted to join. There are a lot of great people here and you will likely find the answers you seek.
I suggest a couple of references you may not have seen yet:
1. http://treyscml.blogspot.com/
Trey's CML blog linked above is a good summary with answers to questions you will likely be asking. Trey is not a doctor by his own admission, but he knows more than about 99% of the Oncologists practicing today. He will gladly answer any question you have posted to this forum.
2. www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/cml/
The NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) guidelines are an excellent resource on CML disease and treatment protocols. It will give you information you can measure against what your doctors tell you. You should use this reference so that you can ask informed questions of your doctors especially if they are deviating from the protocols.
CML is a very treatable disease. The key is to find the best drug that works for you with the least side effects. Over time you will learn that there are many treatment pathways forward that will become somewhat unique to you. Your job is to find what works best. The more you learn the more you will be able to chart your own path.
All the best on your journey.
Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)
with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein
Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate
6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.
2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)
2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)
March 2017 PCR: 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)
June 2017 PCR: "undetected"
September 2017 PCR: "undetected"
#10
Posted 05 October 2017 - 09:30 AM
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#11
Posted 05 October 2017 - 10:03 AM
Your Doctor should not be offended that you are headed to Winship, it is your body, your life. Opinions on the necessity of a BMB may vary here but that test can be done at Emory if they feel it is necessary. Hematologists love CML patients. We survive! Just call and say that you can't make it tomorrow and that you are getting a second opinion. There is nothing improper about that.
Adverse Effect - At about week 6 of Sprycel sharp muscle pain that would start at 2 AM and last for about 4 hours. This lasted about 4 weeks and went away, thank goodness.
#12
Posted 05 October 2017 - 10:12 AM
Very simple - go visit the cancer institute and begin the relationship. Find out now who you will be seeing at Emory so you can research the doctor's area of expertise. They will likely want to do their own testing (bone marrow and blood draws) so be prepared for that. If you have all of your reports and tests in hand, no need to tel your primary Oncologist know anything just yet. If you don't, you will need to ask them for all of your records be sent to Winship or given to you (ideally both). You don't have to explain anything - it's your life, but telling them you are getting a second opinion on treatment options is fine.
I switched doctors early in my journey also when it was clear to me my primary Oncologist had little experience with CML. I went to M.D. Anderson and became a patient under Dr. Cortes. I still use my primary oncologist for drug prescription refills. They're happy to have the business. You may find you work with both institutions - one for routine, the other for specialty. Once you get your CML under control (and you will) and your testing becomes repetitive (i.e. same low acceptable result test after test), you may find that your primary oncologist can take over the routine. If you have to travel far to Emory that can be a factor in wanting someone close by.
In CML - it comes down to routine blood tests once the disease is under control and side effects are minimized and managed. Report here your progress (see forum members signature lines for their own timelines) so you see how you are doing in comparison. I have a suspicion you are going to be a quick responder and be just fine.
Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)
with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein
Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate
6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.
2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)
2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)
March 2017 PCR: 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)
June 2017 PCR: "undetected"
September 2017 PCR: "undetected"
#13
Posted 05 October 2017 - 05:40 PM
Thanks for all the help and advice, the insight it's given me awesome perspective and unfettered calm.
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#14
Posted 05 October 2017 - 06:50 PM
Please keep us posted.
#15
Posted 06 October 2017 - 10:47 AM
I was like a deer staring in the headlights and obviously scared when I was dx'ed a year ago. A lot of folks on this site have already given you a lot of good advice and resources. All I can tell you is that I would have been lost if I had not found this site. The people in this community are amazingly giving of themselves. I have been the beneficiary of that kindness many times. I have learned things here that I never would have learned anywhere else. And perhaps most importantly, this community gave me the courage to advocate for myself with my oncologist for dose reductions when my side effects were very bad.
Look at my signature and if you have any specific questions feel free to send me a private message. Good luck and let this group be your guide.
Dx 9/26/16 WBC 28800; platelets 749; FISH 97% PCR 43%
Tasigna 600MG per day
October 2016 PCR 22% IS
November 2016 PCR 5.8% IS
December 2016 PCR 0.1% IS MMR!!
March 10, 2017 PCR 0.006% IS MR 4.22
Tasigna 450MG per day
April 5, 2017 PCR <.003% IS
June 5, 2017 PCR <.003% IS (dose reduction validated!!!)
Tasigna 300MG per day starting June 15, 2017
6-day drug break starting June 20, 2017 due to multiple AE's
July 24, 2017 PCR <.003% IS
September 18, 2017 Negative, AKA PCRU
Tasigna 150mg per day starting 9/18/17
October 30, 2017 Negative
December 11, 2017 Negative
#16
Posted 06 October 2017 - 03:38 PM
Jack,
You were diagnosed very early, earlier than most of us here. So no real hurry to try to do anything or speed up the process. It will work fast enough. Your BMB will likely show 100% because it only tests for the higher order blood cells, which will likely all be leukemic. The PCR may show a much lower percentage since it is a test for DNA fragments which you can read more about that later. Definitely want to do the BMB since it tests for issues which do not show up anywhere else.
#17
Posted 06 October 2017 - 03:45 PM
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#18
Posted 12 October 2017 - 03:27 PM
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#19
Posted 12 October 2017 - 03:27 PM
WBC 56,000
PCR- I think was 58%
Imatinib 400mg 10/18/2017
#20
Posted 12 October 2017 - 03:37 PM
Any advice for taking Imatinib?
After suffering the nausea that Iamtinib is so notorious for, I discovered that taking Imatinib a full hour after my heaviest meal of the day (dinner, in my case) almost completely eliminated the nausea. Good Luck to you Jack.
For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature
02/2010 Gleevec 400mg
2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive
2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU
2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive
2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)
2015 300, 250, 200, 150
2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR
2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000
2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17
At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.
In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.
longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation. GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.
Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams
Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.
Trey's CML Blog - Stopping - The Odds - Stop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study
Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users