Jump to content


Photo

At what number is it getting serious?


  • Please log in to reply
31 replies to this topic

#1 Pen_Pen

Pen_Pen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 10 August 2017 - 09:35 PM

So I know your number should be 0 (undetectable) but what number would it have to be in order for you to be really worried?

Over the past year my number has slowly been climbing. This last check my number went from 1.0 to 9.0 (5 month time frame). My Dr wants me to start Tasigna asap but I don't want to start until after the new year. He's not happy about my decision. All my normal blood work is perfectly fine. So at what number should I really be worried to the point that I need to start taking this medicine.

My short and not so sweet story:
I was diagnosed June 2001 (age 20), bone marrow transplant March 2002 (age 21, my brother was a match), cancer free until May 2009, took Gleevec for one year until I had to discontinue due to muscle toxicity (ended up in a wheelchair), was undetectable again until about a year ago.

Thank you in advance for your response!

~ Diagnosed Jun 2001 ~ Bone Marrow Transplant Mar 2002 ~ Came back Jun 2009 ~ Gleevec 400mg Jul 2009 ~ Stopped May 2010 Due to muscle toxicity ~ Undetectable ~ Past couple years my number has slowly climbed ~ Currently at a 9. Will be starting Sprycel 70mg soon ~


#2 cmljax

cmljax

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 115 posts

Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:27 AM

Would have to see more of your PCR  history, but if the resutls are a trend up for the last 3 or 4 tests, then a drug switch to either Tasigna or Sprycel is on order.  Also mutation testing


Dx 9/26/16 WBC 28800; platelets 749; FISH 97% PCR 43%

Tasigna 600MG per day

October 2016                     PCR 22% IS

November 2016                 PCR 5.8% IS

December 2016                 PCR 0.1% IS  MMR!!

March 10, 2017                 PCR 0.006% IS  MR 4.22

Tasigna 450MG per day

April 5, 2017                      PCR <.003% IS

June 5, 2017                     PCR <.003% IS (dose reduction validated!!!)

Tasigna 300MG per day starting June 15, 2017

6-day drug break starting June 20, 2017 due to multiple AE's

July 24, 2017                     PCR <.003% IS

September 18, 2017          Negative, AKA PCRU

Tasigna 150mg per day starting 9/18/17

October 30, 2017               Negative

December 11, 2017           Negative


#3 AdamJ

AdamJ

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationTokyo, Japan

Posted 11 August 2017 - 08:08 AM

Have you been off TKI since you stopped taking Gleevec due to the toxicity?  I am no expert, but I would not feel comfortable with anything over 1%. When I first started TKI the doctor told me that anything under 10% was OK though (he was trying to prepare me in case my first set of test results were not so good, I believe). There are others on the forum that will have more informed recommendations, but I would certainly think that it would be appropriate to frequently monitor your WBC and start TKI as soon as the numbers go out of the acceptable range (if you do want to delay).  I think most people who try cessation usually resume when the number goes beyond MMR. 


3/23/2016 Dx PCR 93.4399% IS, FISH 87%
3/30/16 Sprycel 100mg
4/15/2016 liver toxicity and a brief stint on Tasigna 600mg book-ended by drug breaks
6/6/2016 resumed Sprycel at 50 mg increased to 70 one month later followed by 100mg
6/17/2016 FISH Test 2%
8/22/2016 PCR 0.0035% IS
11/7/2016 PCRU
12/29/2016 PCRU
4/5/2017 PCRU
6/28/2017 PCRU
10/26/2017 PCRU


#4 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 11 August 2017 - 08:20 AM

Your number going from 1.0 to 9.0 - I assume these are PCR percentage numbers - is almost a one log increase. You have lost response if you were taking Gleevec and your CML is expanding. You should not wait to start a TKI if you were not taking any drug. In your case, Sprycel would be a good choice. And you likely don't need full dose. Your CML will probably respond quickly to treatment. You would avoid many of the side effects on a 40mg re-start dose using sprycel..

 

As important as PCR is to monitoring treatment effectiveness - it is FISH that is definitive on disease re-lapse and progression. Above 1.0% PCR, you should have a FISH test which looks at CML cells under the microscope. What percentage of cells shows CML (bcr-abl gene) will inform how far the disease has advanced.

 

Do not wait - it will only get worse. Treatment now will put you back to PCRU fast. No need to give CML a chance to progress. It is harder to treat if it advances.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#5 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 11 August 2017 - 08:29 AM

The trajectory is not good.  It is already time to "worry" in the sense of doing something about it.  Need to either restart Gleevec (maybe a lower dosage would help avoid side effects) or start Tasigna. 



#6 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 11 August 2017 - 10:02 AM

Unless you want to go through having a transplant again, I'd get on one of the four medications available.  If Imatinib is a problem, switch to Tasigna or Sprycel (recommended).  


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#7 Cliffee

Cliffee

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts

Posted 11 August 2017 - 01:06 PM

I agree with Trey. It is already time to worry.

 

Definitely get on something. From what i understand Tasigna is very similar to Gleevac so maybe Sprycel? Sprycell also has a good record of reduced dosage working well.

Bosutinib is also known to offer less side effects.

 

You have several choices.



#8 Pen_Pen

Pen_Pen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 11 August 2017 - 04:10 PM

Thank you for all your comments and feedback. It's nice knowing I'm not alone. :)

I'm just a little hesitant to start something again. Gleevec caused so much pain in my life to the point of "crippling" me and having to be in a wheelchair. As of right now I feel normal/healthy. I don't want to start taking Tasigna and then start feeling like sh*t all the time. Ugh!

What's the lowest dose you can take of Tasigna to still be effective? I've seen 300 a day but I'm wondering if 150 a day would work. Hmmmmm?

~ Diagnosed Jun 2001 ~ Bone Marrow Transplant Mar 2002 ~ Came back Jun 2009 ~ Gleevec 400mg Jul 2009 ~ Stopped May 2010 Due to muscle toxicity ~ Undetectable ~ Past couple years my number has slowly climbed ~ Currently at a 9. Will be starting Sprycel 70mg soon ~


#9 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 11 August 2017 - 04:33 PM

Thank you for all your comments and feedback. It's nice knowing I'm not alone. :)

I'm just a little hesitant to start something again. Gleevec caused so much pain in my life to the point of "crippling" me and having to be in a wheelchair. As of right now I feel normal/healthy. I don't want to start taking Tasigna and then start feeling like sh*t all the time. Ugh!

What's the lowest dose you can take of Tasigna to still be effective? I've seen 300 a day but I'm wondering if 150 a day would work. Hmmmmm?

 

You may feel "normal", but you are not "healthy" - your numbers are going up and as Trey noted, it's past time to worry. 

 

Given how you feel about taking anything - you should strongly consider taking low dose Sprycel (20mg) and get started. There is an excellent chance that this dose will be sufficient in your case and drive your PCR levels back down - perhaps even back to undetected. The key is to start taking it now.

 

I take 20 mg. and I am PCRU ('undetected'). I feel no side effects whatsoever. Sprycel works differently than Gleevec or Tasigna. There is a very good chance it will mop up your CML in a way Gleevec did not. You may even be able to go off medication in a few years once you achieve PCRU a second time. Your numbers are increasing because you stopped taking your medication. Don't be stupid.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#10 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 11 August 2017 - 05:05 PM

What's the lowest dose you can take of Tasigna to still be effective? I've seen 300 a day but I'm wondering if 150 a day would work.

 

We are all different, so need different dosages to have the required impact.  You need to try by trial and error.  Sometimes low dosage gets someone all the way down to undetectable, and sometimes not.  At this point you just need to start at some dosage and see if it works well and also has acceptable (not necessarily zero) side effects.  150mg Tasigna per day may be enough for you, but maybe not.  No one knows the dosage requirement answer for any individual.



#11 kat73

kat73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 884 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC area

Posted 11 August 2017 - 05:35 PM

Agree with all above.  Why are you not considering Sprycel?  It's a lot easier to take than Tasigna, as there are no requirements to fast before and after - you can take it anytime.  It also has a much shorter half-life than your Gleevec did - making the chance of feeling sh***y all the time much less.  Anecdotally, personally, I suspect that people who have a wretched experience with Gleevec do fine on Sprycel, and vice versa.  That was true for me.  I hear you, believe me.  I think if someone told me tomorrow I absolutely had no choice but to take Gleevec again, I'd be looking for the nearest bridge.  But Sprycel is my friend.  Sort of a jerk of a friend, but friend nonetheless.  But, most of all, LISTEN to all these people and your onc - get going on one of the TKI's and pronto.  Like last week.


Dx July 2009 on routine physical.  WBC 94.  Started Gleevec 400 mg Sept 2009.  MMR at 2yrs.  Side effects (malaise, depression/anxiety, fatigue, nausea, periorbital edema) never improved.  Kidney issues developed because of Gleevec.  Switched to Sprycel 70 mg in Aug 2011.  Above side effects disappeared or improved.  Have been MR3.5 - 4.5 ever since.  Two untreated pleural effusions followed by one treated by stopping Sprycel Jan 2017.  After 9 weeks, PCR showed loss of MMR; re-started Sprycel at 50 mg and in 3 months was back to <0.01% IS.  Pleural effusion returned within a couple of months, same as before (moderate, left side only).  Stopped Sprycel 50 mg for 12 weeks; pleural effusion resolved.  At about a monthoff the drug, PCR was 0.03; at 11 weeks it was 2.06 - lost CCyR? Have returned to 50 mg Sprycel for 3 weeks, intending to reduce to 20 mg going forward.


#12 thatguy

thatguy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 318 posts
  • LocationWild west

Posted 11 August 2017 - 07:54 PM

At a point you've passed. 1% is the panic switch. Go get another drug, don't wait unless you're checking out. I felt the worst on Gleevec, fyi.
3/25/2015- Dx'ed by FISH : 85% of cells dual-fusion signals, 7% with tri-fusion signals, WBC 212,000. Started Gleevec 400mg.... Calculated .93 SOKAL

08/17/2015- 14.793 % I.S P210 (quest)
10/15/2015- 3.313 % I.S (quest)
12/23/2015- 1.891 % I.S (quest)
1/07/2016- Tasigna 300mg 2x daily
1/14/2016- 4.414 % I.S P210- City Of Hope lab, mutation negative.
1/26/2016- 1.589 % I.S (quest)
2/22/2016- 1.719 % I.S (quest)
2/29/2016- 1.133 % I.S (quest)
3/03/2016- Tasigna 400mg 2x daily.
3/29/2016- 0.663 % I.S (quest)
4/27/2016- 0.781 % I.S (quest)
5/04/2016- 0.652 % I.S.(quest)
5/24/2016- 0.501 % I.S (quest)
6/28/2016-0.534 % I.S (quest)
7/15/2016-0.881 % I.S (quest)
7/22/2016- Bosulif 500mg
7/28/2016- t315i test- Negative
8/22/2016-0.432 % I.S (quest )
11/15/2016-0.325 % I.S (quest)
2/1/2017- .0445% i.s (genoptix)
5/6/2017- .0968% i.s (genoptix)
5/12/2017- .12 % i.s (quest).
6/4/2017- .083% i.s (quest)
6/11/2017- .0295% i.s (genoptix)
8/5/2017- .0501% i.s (genoptix)
11/6/2017- .0270% i.s (genoptix)

#13 Pen_Pen

Pen_Pen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 12 August 2017 - 12:43 PM

You may feel "normal", but you are not "healthy" - your numbers are going up and as Trey noted, it's past time to worry. 
 
Given how you feel about taking anything - you should strongly consider taking low dose Sprycel (20mg) and get started. There is an excellent chance that this dose will be sufficient in your case and drive your PCR levels back down - perhaps even back to undetected. The key is to start taking it now.
 
I take 20 mg. and I am PCRU ('undetected'). I feel no side effects whatsoever. Sprycel works differently than Gleevec or Tasigna. There is a very good chance it will mop up your CML in a way Gleevec did not. You may even be able to go off medication in a few years once you achieve PCRU a second time. Your numbers are increasing because you stopped taking your medication. Don't be stupid.


I'm going to speak with my Onc on Monday and see if he'd be okay with me starting out on 20mg Sprycel. I just always thought it was similar to Gleevec bcuz of the edema/water retention.

~ Diagnosed Jun 2001 ~ Bone Marrow Transplant Mar 2002 ~ Came back Jun 2009 ~ Gleevec 400mg Jul 2009 ~ Stopped May 2010 Due to muscle toxicity ~ Undetectable ~ Past couple years my number has slowly climbed ~ Currently at a 9. Will be starting Sprycel 70mg soon ~


#14 kat73

kat73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 884 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC area

Posted 12 August 2017 - 02:20 PM

Way, way, WAY less edema than on gleevec, in my experience.  Onc will probably not let you start at 20 mg, but don't be afraid of 50 or 70.  If he insists on 100, go with it until your numbers are back down; then you can ask to go lower. 


Dx July 2009 on routine physical.  WBC 94.  Started Gleevec 400 mg Sept 2009.  MMR at 2yrs.  Side effects (malaise, depression/anxiety, fatigue, nausea, periorbital edema) never improved.  Kidney issues developed because of Gleevec.  Switched to Sprycel 70 mg in Aug 2011.  Above side effects disappeared or improved.  Have been MR3.5 - 4.5 ever since.  Two untreated pleural effusions followed by one treated by stopping Sprycel Jan 2017.  After 9 weeks, PCR showed loss of MMR; re-started Sprycel at 50 mg and in 3 months was back to <0.01% IS.  Pleural effusion returned within a couple of months, same as before (moderate, left side only).  Stopped Sprycel 50 mg for 12 weeks; pleural effusion resolved.  At about a monthoff the drug, PCR was 0.03; at 11 weeks it was 2.06 - lost CCyR? Have returned to 50 mg Sprycel for 3 weeks, intending to reduce to 20 mg going forward.


#15 Pen_Pen

Pen_Pen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 12 August 2017 - 02:25 PM

Way, way, WAY less edema than on gleevec, in my experience.  Onc will probably not let you start at 20 mg, but don't be afraid of 50 or 70.  If he insists on 100, go with it until your numbers are back down; then you can ask to go lower.


You're probably right, he won't let me start at 20mg. If he doesn't I probably will be forced to go with Tasigna. Our insurance will only cover 20mg, anything higher the copy is more than our mortgage. :(

~ Diagnosed Jun 2001 ~ Bone Marrow Transplant Mar 2002 ~ Came back Jun 2009 ~ Gleevec 400mg Jul 2009 ~ Stopped May 2010 Due to muscle toxicity ~ Undetectable ~ Past couple years my number has slowly climbed ~ Currently at a 9. Will be starting Sprycel 70mg soon ~


#16 kat73

kat73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 884 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC area

Posted 12 August 2017 - 03:04 PM

That canNOT be correct.  The standard recommended dose of Sprycel is 100 mg once a day.  If anything, a super nosy insurance company might question 20 mg and ask for documentation for the reason.  You need to go back and doublecheck this.  Never heard of such a thing.


Dx July 2009 on routine physical.  WBC 94.  Started Gleevec 400 mg Sept 2009.  MMR at 2yrs.  Side effects (malaise, depression/anxiety, fatigue, nausea, periorbital edema) never improved.  Kidney issues developed because of Gleevec.  Switched to Sprycel 70 mg in Aug 2011.  Above side effects disappeared or improved.  Have been MR3.5 - 4.5 ever since.  Two untreated pleural effusions followed by one treated by stopping Sprycel Jan 2017.  After 9 weeks, PCR showed loss of MMR; re-started Sprycel at 50 mg and in 3 months was back to <0.01% IS.  Pleural effusion returned within a couple of months, same as before (moderate, left side only).  Stopped Sprycel 50 mg for 12 weeks; pleural effusion resolved.  At about a monthoff the drug, PCR was 0.03; at 11 weeks it was 2.06 - lost CCyR? Have returned to 50 mg Sprycel for 3 weeks, intending to reduce to 20 mg going forward.


#17 AdamJ

AdamJ

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationTokyo, Japan

Posted 13 August 2017 - 11:19 AM

I agree and there is also a copay assistance program: https://www.sprycel....sprycel-assist/. You may not have a copay at all if you enroll in that program. With my current insurance it covers 100% of the copay.  They should automatically set you up with that program at your hospital. Ask them about it if they don't mention it. 

 

That canNOT be correct.  The standard recommended dose of Sprycel is 100 mg once a day.  If anything, a super nosy insurance company might question 20 mg and ask for documentation for the reason.  You need to go back and doublecheck this.  Never heard of such a thing.


3/23/2016 Dx PCR 93.4399% IS, FISH 87%
3/30/16 Sprycel 100mg
4/15/2016 liver toxicity and a brief stint on Tasigna 600mg book-ended by drug breaks
6/6/2016 resumed Sprycel at 50 mg increased to 70 one month later followed by 100mg
6/17/2016 FISH Test 2%
8/22/2016 PCR 0.0035% IS
11/7/2016 PCRU
12/29/2016 PCRU
4/5/2017 PCRU
6/28/2017 PCRU
10/26/2017 PCRU


#18 Pen_Pen

Pen_Pen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 13 August 2017 - 01:32 PM

I agree and there is also a copay assistance program: https://www.sprycel....sprycel-assist/. You may not have a copay at all if you enroll in that program. With my current insurance it covers 100% of the copay.  They should automatically set you up with that program at your hospital. Ask them about it if they don't mention it. 

 

Thank you for the website, I'll have to look into that.


~ Diagnosed Jun 2001 ~ Bone Marrow Transplant Mar 2002 ~ Came back Jun 2009 ~ Gleevec 400mg Jul 2009 ~ Stopped May 2010 Due to muscle toxicity ~ Undetectable ~ Past couple years my number has slowly climbed ~ Currently at a 9. Will be starting Sprycel 70mg soon ~


#19 Pen_Pen

Pen_Pen

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 12 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 13 August 2017 - 01:51 PM

So I guess it boils down to, I need to start something.  The question is which one?  Sprycel or Tasigna?  When on Gleevec I had horrendous muscle cramps and swelling.  I am worried I'll have the same issues with Sprycel.  However with Tasigna, you have to be careful how you eat and I've read you can receive a horrible rash.  It's very depressing but I know I can't be "stupid" and not take nothing.

 

Thanks again to everyone!  I appreciate you all!


~ Diagnosed Jun 2001 ~ Bone Marrow Transplant Mar 2002 ~ Came back Jun 2009 ~ Gleevec 400mg Jul 2009 ~ Stopped May 2010 Due to muscle toxicity ~ Undetectable ~ Past couple years my number has slowly climbed ~ Currently at a 9. Will be starting Sprycel 70mg soon ~


#20 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 13 August 2017 - 06:44 PM

The muscle cramps are worst with Gleevec, and not usually a big issue with the others.  You could just pick whichever one you want or is easier for you. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users