Jump to content


Photo

Differential depth of treatment response required for optimal outcome in patients with blast phase versus chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 gerry

gerry

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,035 posts

Posted 13 April 2017 - 08:30 PM

The outcome of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has improved dramatically following the introduction of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy.1With TKI treatment, most patients with CML, chronic phase (CML-CP) can achieve complete cytogenetic response (CCyR) within 12 months after initial diagnosis of CML. Thanks to the high sensitivity of molecular methods to detect BCR-ABL1transcripts, deeper molecular responses can now be ascertained, including major molecular response (MMR), MR4 or MR4.5 (4 and 4.5-log reduction of BCR-ABL1fusion transcripts, respectively), and molecularly undetectable leukemia (MUL).23It seems intuitive that the deeper the treatment response, the better the survival of patients with CML-CP is.45 However, multiple studies have shown that deeper responses beyond CCyR confer no survival benefit. Patients with CML-CP who achieve CCyR have a very favorable survival similar to that of the general population.67 In contrast, CML-CP patients who are unable to achieve CCyR have a significantly poorer survival, suggesting that achieving CCyR is essential for predicting a favorable outcome.

https://www.nature.c.../bcj20174a.html 



#2 jmoorhou

jmoorhou

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 314 posts
  • LocationOutside of San Francisco

Posted 13 April 2017 - 10:15 PM

Question is does a deeper response increase chances of cutting down or stopping.


Diagnosed 3/2014 WBC 28 Non detectable within 3 monthsGleevec 400 mg 5/2014 one hour after dinner really improves nausea300 mg 12/15/2016200 mg and 300 mg Gleevec 2/25/2017 (after 3 years on Gleevec) For last four months taking 300 mg per day. Last CMC showed liver enzymes elevated, went to a good Naturopath and he recommended 4 Tumeric, 10,000 mg Vitamen D, and 3 milk thistle (silymarin) daily. Also use One<p>Day Detox Dandeloin tea, and Nettle Tea and a slice of ginger every day...in two months liver tests were below normal.Janis

#3 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 13 April 2017 - 10:55 PM

Question is does a deeper response increase chances of cutting down or stopping.

 

Yes.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#4 Melanie

Melanie

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 219 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 14 April 2017 - 12:36 AM

That's great news for those that have reached CcyR, but not quite MMR or those of us who go in and out of MMR.

Unfortunately, lowering dose and or cessation are not as promising for this group.
Dx - 05/2011; PCR: 15.04; Fish: 87% Slow responder due to pancytopenia. Current - Bosulif - Nov: 2012, Mar 2016 lowered to 300 mg. 07/16 back to 400 mg. Clinical trial drug, Promacta, Feb 2013, for low Platelets.
CyCR - Aug 2014, Positive for 1 chromosome Sep 2015. PCR: 12.77 in Oct, 2012 to 0.04 (MDA) in Mar, 2016. 4/2016 - 0.126 (Local lab (IS); 05/2016 - 0.195 (local); 6/2016 - 0.07 (MDA); 7/2016 - 0.03 (local) 9/13/2016 - 0.16 (MDA); 9/26/2016 - 0.31 (MDA); 11/2016 - 0.012 (local); 01/2017 - 0.24 (MDA); 04/2017 - 0.09 (MDA); Cytogenetics show der(1:7)(q10;p10)7 chromosome mutation. Repeat of Sep 2015. PCR - 6/2017- 0.035 (local); 10/2017- 0.02 (MDA)




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users