Jump to content


Photo

anyone off tki have blips on occasion? or do they just continue to climb?


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Frogiegirl

Frogiegirl

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 259 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 02:21 PM

Would like to hear of others experiences going off tki, blips, declines, back to pcru? Curious. .......thanks in advance!

Diagnosed Oct 2013 Started 600mg of Tasigna  on Nov 4th. Lowered dose a few months later to 300mg due to side affects stayed here declining PCR until March 2015 small jump from 0.0072 to 0.0083 scarred my doc into full dose of Tasigna again 600mg(been miserable since) but reached PCRU 06/15/2015(next test) and have been there ever since. Hoping to have another little one. I have the support of my doc to go off anytime, just scared to jump. might go two years PCRU but he said it wont make much of a difference. I just figured I could possibly go into a trial while preggers if I got the two years behind me.

Nov 8th 2017 went off Tasigna

Dec 1st PCRU off TKI

Jan 5th PCR Detected .0625

Feb 1st PCR Detected .7815

Added 8-6 grams Curcumin daily in Feb

March 3rd PCR Detected 3.2646 YIKES!

 stopped trying for baby after February reading. will start new TKI march 16th 2017 (Sprycel)

FYI I'm not done trying for my last little one.


#2 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,039 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 11 January 2017 - 02:42 PM

I went off Sprycel for nine months in 2015 (January - September) and experienced no increase for more than three months, but then a slow rise from near PCRU (<0.01%) to as high as 0.07%. occurred. It was not linear ... The month it hit .07%, the following month it fell back to 0.02%. I never lost MMR and my Doctor wanted me to continue off Sprycel to see how long I can stay below MMR. I decided to resume 20mg Sprycel to verify that my PCR would drop back down again to < 0.01% which it did quickly. I expect to test cessation again and will remain off as long as I do not lose MMR. The major reason I went back on Sprycel was to avoid the monthly testing (and parking) at M.D. Anderson! At where I am now, I may test at six month intervals instead of three months. 


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#3 cleocans

cleocans

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 34 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 04:18 PM

I went off Sprycel after almost 3 years undetectable.  My PCR quickly went back up, 0.33% after 2 months off. My onc wanted me to stay off for one more month to see what happens.  It shot up to 1.7%, so needless to say I am back on 100mg Sprycel.  I go back in 6 weeks, hopefully like all that have had to go back on meds, it goes back down!



#4 gerry

gerry

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,034 posts

Posted 11 January 2017 - 05:10 PM

A number of our TFR members have blips, and they remain down in the noise level. But we also have new members who have the CML return. I am over 3 years TFR and so far have remained negative.

#5 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 964 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 11 January 2017 - 11:22 PM

from the Stop Studies

STIM2 http://bit.ly/1IbwZuh 2011

treated only with imatinib; MR4.5 DMR of at least 2 years duration;. median age 61, 62 men. 62 women 
76 of 124 (61%) remained treatment free ... However 41 experienced a BCR-ABL RQ-PCR fluctuation without clear molecular relapse. In this so-called-fluctuation group of patients, 7 were found positive once, 6 twice, 12 patients between 3 and 5 times, 10 patients between 6 and 10 times and 6 patients more than 10 times confirming that BCR-ABL reappearance does not mean automatically clinical relapse.

For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#6 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,685 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 12 January 2017 - 09:23 AM

For those on drug cessation programs, the ones who become stable may sometimes have blips, but the ones who lose response (most people) have continued upward PCRs.  It is more likely to lose response than have blips.  And that data is for those who had been PCRU for extended period of time.  Those without extended PCRU almost always just lose response. 


Edited by Trey, 12 January 2017 - 09:00 PM.


#7 ChrisC

ChrisC

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 38 posts

Posted 12 January 2017 - 02:55 PM

In full gratitude, no blips at all to report.

 

ChrisC


Be alert, but not overly concerned.

 

• Dx Oct. 22, 2008, WBC 459k, in ICU for 2 days + in hospital 1 week

• Leukapheresis for 1 week, to reduce WBC (wasn't given Hydroxyurea)

• Oct. 28, 2008: CML confirmed, start Gleevec 400mg

• Oct. 31, 2008: sent home when WBC reached 121k

• On/off, reduced dose Gleevec for 7 months

• April 2009: Started Sprycel 100mg

• Sept. 2009: PCRU 0.000

• Sept. 2011: after 2 years steady PCRU & taking Sprycel 100mg before bed, quit Sprycel (with permission)

• Currently: still steady PCRU, testing every 6 months 🤗

— Fatigue, hearing loss continue, alas, but I prefer to think it is all getting better!

 

 


#8 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 155 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 08 March 2017 - 12:20 PM

Would like to hear of others experiences going off tki, blips, declines, back to pcru? Curious. .......thanks in advance!

 

Frogiegirl,  I was reading your CML history and was struck by the part where you said, "jump from 0.0072 to 0.0083 scarred my doc into full dose of Tasigna again 600mg(been miserable since)".  Those two PCR numbers didn't signify a jump at all, in reality you probably still had a declining PCR as evidenced by the results of your next test.

 

If your doc was alarmed by that "jump", how concerned is he/she now?  What dose are you going to start at with the Sprycel?  Hopefully the Sprycel will work better for you and kill off those dang CML stem cells with no side effects!


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#9 Frogiegirl

Frogiegirl

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 259 posts

Posted 08 March 2017 - 12:54 PM

Red Cross Kirk, I'm waiting on march 3rd results now, but my doc  is holding at not treating until I'm over the 1.0 mark. which I am sure I am now. the plan is to start sprycel at 50 (at my request because I am scurred of full dose :ph34r: ) Its hard to be off knowing my PCR is climbing, but if I were preggers (which is why I went off to try for in the first place) I'd be doing the same thing anyhoo until delivery. Not sure why he's not overly concerned now, maybe because more data has come to light since then?  Maybe sprycel will be my golden ticket? I feel like a dog with my tail between my legs....I tried.


Diagnosed Oct 2013 Started 600mg of Tasigna  on Nov 4th. Lowered dose a few months later to 300mg due to side affects stayed here declining PCR until March 2015 small jump from 0.0072 to 0.0083 scarred my doc into full dose of Tasigna again 600mg(been miserable since) but reached PCRU 06/15/2015(next test) and have been there ever since. Hoping to have another little one. I have the support of my doc to go off anytime, just scared to jump. might go two years PCRU but he said it wont make much of a difference. I just figured I could possibly go into a trial while preggers if I got the two years behind me.

Nov 8th 2017 went off Tasigna

Dec 1st PCRU off TKI

Jan 5th PCR Detected .0625

Feb 1st PCR Detected .7815

Added 8-6 grams Curcumin daily in Feb

March 3rd PCR Detected 3.2646 YIKES!

 stopped trying for baby after February reading. will start new TKI march 16th 2017 (Sprycel)

FYI I'm not done trying for my last little one.


#10 mdszj

mdszj

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts

Posted 09 March 2017 - 05:19 PM

I was undetectable for approx 1 year, then had a pcr blip up to 0.043% (IS).  A month later I did a repeat test and my pcr showed 0.005%.  While all this took place I was still on 100 mg sprycel.  Four months later I went back to undetectable, but due to the blip I had to reset the clock with respect to going off the S.  After almost 2 years I just recently stopped my medication, and so far I am still undetectable after 3 months.  Neither my local hemo nor my specialist ever really gave me an explanation for the blip.

 

Hope this helps.


dx cml 7/2012; 100 mg sprycel; splenectomy 9/2012; reached prcu 10/2013; dx smoldering myeloma 1/2015; 80 mg sprycel 12/2015; 50 mg sprycel 7/13/16; discontinued sprycel 11/15/16


#11 jjg

jjg

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 80 posts

Posted 13 March 2017 - 04:45 PM

Frogie  as you know my PCR rose just like yours did twice, once failing to get pregnant and once while pregnant. It is just typical of people who fail the stop trial, actually the majority of people who try to stop. We started interferon at about this point but clearly as you have decided to stop trying for now then starting sprycel is a great idea. The time that I did get pregnant it was first go which is just amazingly good luck, well not entirely luck as we were using a high quality donor egg embryo, but still a lot of luck involved. If I hadn't have had that luck we were not planning to stay off treatment til the next month but go back on treatment for 6 to 8 weeks and then try again. This was actually my idea but the doctors were happy to run with it. The idea is that you keep knocking the CML back to very low  levels not because you expect it will not come back but so that when you eventually get pregnant you get an extra few months before starting interferon. As I do poorly with side effects on interferon for me an extra few months without interferon is worth working for. In any case I think you would want to be pregnant before starting interferon as being unwell is not going to increase your chances of getting pregnant.

If you want to try again then you have to assume that the CML will come back and have plans to deal with it.  It's most likely that within 6-12 months you will be PCRU again and then you have to decide if you want to wait or go straight away. For our second attempt at pregnancy we waited 2 years in the hope that I would remain PCRU or low levels during the pregnancy. But I relapsed at the same rate and that two years of waiting maybe gave me an extra week or two off interferon. If I was to go again I wouldn't wait two years but I would assume a relapse - if it doesn't happen, happy days.

It is a real suck feast having to restart treatment without a pregnancy. All the people in my mother's group are busy planning their next babies now based on when it's convenient and doing crazy things like buying houses with an extra bedroom for the child that will be easily conceived in the future. So yeah it does suck to be doing the trying for a family thing with cancer but at these times I try very hard to remind myself of just how lucky we are to aspire to being normal.

I hope you do drag your tail out from between your legs and try again, we did and this morning I'm the proud mother of a very cranky snotty nosed toddler :-)


Dx Dec 2010 @37

2x IVF egg collection

Glivec 600 & 800mg

PCRU March 2012

Unsuccessful pregnancy attempt - relapsed, 3 months interferon (intron A), bad side effects from interferon

Nilotinib 600mg Oct 2012

PCRU April 2013, 2 years MR4.5 mostly PCRU with a few blips

April 2015 stopped again for pregnancy attempt (donor egg), pregnant first transfer, 0.110 at 10wks, 2.1 at 14wks, 4.2 at 16wks, started interferon, slow dose increase to 25MIU per wk, at full dose PCR< 1 for remainder of pregnancy

Healthy baby girl Jan 2016, breastfed one month

Nilotinib 600mg Feb 2016

MMR May 2016

PCRU Feb 2017





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users