Jump to content


Photo

Undedected


  • Please log in to reply
23 replies to this topic

#1 Floa7

Floa7

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Locationindiana

Posted 01 June 2016 - 10:21 AM

My son went to the doc this morning. He has been undedectable for 2 years. I asked her about stopping his Sprycel or reducing his dosage. She said it was better to stop the Sprycel then to reduce it. He could build up a resistance to the Sprycel.

I have 8 more months to go for my 2 year mark of undedectable and I am on Tasigna for now.


1 2012 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

In nov 2014 my pcr started to rise by Feb I stopped Gleevec and went onto

2 2015 Tasigna 600 mg/day

I have been PCRU for 2 years and stopped Tasigna 4 7 2017

5 8 2017 results 0.008

5 30 2017 results 0.028 

6 30 2017 results 0.3, I have restarted the Tasigna because it went above 0.1 

 

My son

11 2011 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

He went 2 1/2 years on gleevec and lost PCRU

Started Sprycel went PCRU for 2 years and stopped the Sprycel, went back for 3 month checkup and PCR was 8.0

He went back onto Sprycel and now is PCRU again

3 16 2017 results 0.008

6 1 2017 results 0.002


#2 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 01 June 2016 - 11:04 AM

"She said it was better to stop the Sprycel then to reduce it. He could build up a resistance to the Sprycel."

 

She should have her license revoked. Truly incompetent. Find another doctor.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#3 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 01 June 2016 - 11:08 AM

The TKI drug resistance issue has been abandoned by all serious CML Specialists and most regular Oncs.  But some have not yet learned this.  Too bad, it is a harmful myth.



#4 MarCap73

MarCap73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 01 June 2016 - 11:28 AM

My son went to the doc this morning. He has been undedectable for 2 years. I asked her about stopping his Sprycel or reducing his dosage. She said it was better to stop the Sprycel then to reduce it. He could build up a resistance to the Sprycel.

I have 8 more months to go for my 2 year mark of undedectable and I am on Tasigna for now.

 

This is a bit off topic but the first I have heard of of a parent-child both having CML.  

 

All the reading I have done says that there is little, to no evidence of the hereditary passing of CML.  Have any of you long term posters, Trey, Scuba, etc. seen other posters with multiple family members? Parent-child, siblings, etc?


Dx: 11/2015

Sprycel: 100mg

 

May-17: 0.0095% IS

Aug-17: 0.0048% IS

Nov-17: 0.0066% IS

 

 


#5 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 01 June 2016 - 11:36 AM

Unless they were both exposed to the same environmental condition that caused it. 9/11 comes to mind as well as radiation sources.


10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#6 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 01 June 2016 - 12:08 PM

As my Oncologist told me when I mentioned to him about Audrey (RIP); "Better have them check the water".  

 

Benzene has completely polluted our environment, it is everywhere, from car exhaust and gasoline/diesel fumes (or even getting the liquid on your skin) to our water and our food/beverages.  Do a search on Benzene in soft drinks as just one example.  

 

If they use well water, which many people do in rural areas, it could be in their water supply.  Water filters generally filter out the Benzene in water.


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#7 Floa7

Floa7

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Locationindiana

Posted 01 June 2016 - 02:17 PM

The TKI drug resistance issue has been abandoned by all serious CML Specialists and most regular Oncs.  But some have not yet learned this.  Too bad, it is a harmful myth.

Both of us had to stop the Gleevec, it stopped working. Possibly the word was not resistance that she used. This brain fog we get on these Chemo pills..... When I typed that it took me 10 minutes to come with resistance.

 

And for both of us to have CML, two other neighbors were diagnosed within 6 months of us. We are all on well water and had the big flood of 2008 Also their is lots of industrial factories close to us. We got CML in 2012. I have 8 more months to go undetected for my 2 years


1 2012 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

In nov 2014 my pcr started to rise by Feb I stopped Gleevec and went onto

2 2015 Tasigna 600 mg/day

I have been PCRU for 2 years and stopped Tasigna 4 7 2017

5 8 2017 results 0.008

5 30 2017 results 0.028 

6 30 2017 results 0.3, I have restarted the Tasigna because it went above 0.1 

 

My son

11 2011 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

He went 2 1/2 years on gleevec and lost PCRU

Started Sprycel went PCRU for 2 years and stopped the Sprycel, went back for 3 month checkup and PCR was 8.0

He went back onto Sprycel and now is PCRU again

3 16 2017 results 0.008

6 1 2017 results 0.002


#8 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 01 June 2016 - 02:30 PM

Sounds like a big lawsuit to me but that is just my opinion.


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#9 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 01 June 2016 - 05:37 PM

In that case I would say for sure it is the water. A lawsuit needs to happen. It is the only way to find and stop the company that is causing the problem.

I too am on well water but we had it tested and no contamination was present.

10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#10 MarCap73

MarCap73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 02 June 2016 - 09:04 AM

And for both of us to have CML, two other neighbors were diagnosed within 6 months of us. We are all on well water and had the big flood of 2008 Also their is lots of industrial factories close to us. We got CML in 2012. I have 8 more months to go undetected for my 2 years

 

Wow.  Definitely sounds like an environmental factor.  Way too many people to be coincidental.  That's definitely a cancer cluster.

 

I hope that you continue to see good progress!  


Dx: 11/2015

Sprycel: 100mg

 

May-17: 0.0095% IS

Aug-17: 0.0048% IS

Nov-17: 0.0066% IS

 

 


#11 Floa7

Floa7

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Locationindiana

Posted 03 June 2016 - 02:38 PM

The TKI drug resistance issue has been abandoned by all serious CML Specialists and most regular Oncs.  But some have not yet learned this.  Too bad, it is a harmful myth.

Once tolerance or resistance has developed to a drug, doctors may increase the dose or use a different drug.

 
That is what my onco did used a different drug Tasigna. The gleevec stopped working, I was RESISTANT to the Gleevec. After a 1 1/2 years going down to 0.002, It rose to 8.0 The Gleevec stopped working.

1 2012 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

In nov 2014 my pcr started to rise by Feb I stopped Gleevec and went onto

2 2015 Tasigna 600 mg/day

I have been PCRU for 2 years and stopped Tasigna 4 7 2017

5 8 2017 results 0.008

5 30 2017 results 0.028 

6 30 2017 results 0.3, I have restarted the Tasigna because it went above 0.1 

 

My son

11 2011 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

He went 2 1/2 years on gleevec and lost PCRU

Started Sprycel went PCRU for 2 years and stopped the Sprycel, went back for 3 month checkup and PCR was 8.0

He went back onto Sprycel and now is PCRU again

3 16 2017 results 0.008

6 1 2017 results 0.002


#12 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 03 June 2016 - 05:20 PM

Yeah I guess I don't understand. Many people stopped Gleevec because they became resistant to it. What causes that resistance or is their another term to explain it?

10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#13 Floa7

Floa7

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Locationindiana

Posted 14 June 2016 - 03:06 PM

Well Scuba or Trey you don't seem to have an answer for us


1 2012 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

In nov 2014 my pcr started to rise by Feb I stopped Gleevec and went onto

2 2015 Tasigna 600 mg/day

I have been PCRU for 2 years and stopped Tasigna 4 7 2017

5 8 2017 results 0.008

5 30 2017 results 0.028 

6 30 2017 results 0.3, I have restarted the Tasigna because it went above 0.1 

 

My son

11 2011 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

He went 2 1/2 years on gleevec and lost PCRU

Started Sprycel went PCRU for 2 years and stopped the Sprycel, went back for 3 month checkup and PCR was 8.0

He went back onto Sprycel and now is PCRU again

3 16 2017 results 0.008

6 1 2017 results 0.002


#14 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 14 June 2016 - 03:21 PM

My son went to the doc this morning. He has been undedectable for 2 years. I asked her about stopping his Sprycel or reducing his dosage. She said it was better to stop the Sprycel then to reduce it. He could build up a resistance to the Sprycel.

This discussion began when your apparently uninformed oncologist suggested that your son could develop a resistance to Sprycel due to dosage reduction.  


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#15 gerry

gerry

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,035 posts

Posted 14 June 2016 - 05:07 PM

If I was your son, I would probably have a go at cessation. But as there seems a possibility of something else going on in your environment, in that the two of you wound up with CML, I would want close monitoring.
As to a lower dose causing resistance, I'm not too sure about that. I was on 300 mg Gleevec for a year prior to stopping and have now been off a TKI for over two and a half years and (touch wood) still remain negative for CML.
I don't doubt the potential of CML to become resistant to a TKI.

#16 thatguy

thatguy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 318 posts
  • LocationWild west

Posted 14 June 2016 - 07:39 PM


Once tolerance or resistance has developed to a drug, doctors may increase the dose or use a different drug.

That is what my onco did used a different drug Tasigna. The gleevec stopped working, I was RESISTANT to the Gleevec. After a 1 1/2 years going down to 0.002, It rose to 8.0 The Gleevec stopped working.


I believe what Trey was referring to was resistance occurring from lowering dosage, not that resistance doesn't occur for any other reason, because it does obviously, and he's mentioned it more times on here in some fashion, than we've probably logged on.
3/25/2015- Dx'ed by FISH : 85% of cells dual-fusion signals, 7% with tri-fusion signals, WBC 212,000. Started Gleevec 400mg.... Calculated .93 SOKAL

08/17/2015- 14.793 % I.S P210 (quest)
10/15/2015- 3.313 % I.S (quest)
12/23/2015- 1.891 % I.S (quest)
1/07/2016- Tasigna 300mg 2x daily
1/14/2016- 4.414 % I.S P210- City Of Hope lab, mutation negative.
1/26/2016- 1.589 % I.S (quest)
2/22/2016- 1.719 % I.S (quest)
2/29/2016- 1.133 % I.S (quest)
3/03/2016- Tasigna 400mg 2x daily.
3/29/2016- 0.663 % I.S (quest)
4/27/2016- 0.781 % I.S (quest)
5/04/2016- 0.652 % I.S.(quest)
5/24/2016- 0.501 % I.S (quest)
6/28/2016-0.534 % I.S (quest)
7/15/2016-0.881 % I.S (quest)
7/22/2016- Bosulif 500mg
7/28/2016- t315i test- Negative
8/22/2016-0.432 % I.S (quest )
11/15/2016-0.325 % I.S (quest)
2/1/2017- .0445% i.s (genoptix)
5/6/2017- .0968% i.s (genoptix)
5/12/2017- .12 % i.s (quest).
6/4/2017- .083% i.s (quest)
6/11/2017- .0295% i.s (genoptix)
8/5/2017- .0501% i.s (genoptix)
11/6/2017- .0270% i.s (genoptix)

#17 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 14 June 2016 - 08:07 PM

I understand that dosage amount may not cause resistance. But what does cause resistance? I guess erratic adherence?

10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#18 thatguy

thatguy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 318 posts
  • LocationWild west

Posted 15 June 2016 - 01:01 AM

I understand that dosage amount may not cause resistance. But what does cause resistance? I guess erratic adherence?

My opinion: (based on reading and no training or professional research)- yes, spotty adherence, absorption, physiological traits of the bonding points, disease' ability to adapt, and dietary habits, supplements and other medications....(somebody's welcome to correct me on phrasing or any of that)...that said, it would be contradictory, to then say lowering dose COULDN'T cause resistance, because several of those items' premise for causing resistance relates to the amount of drug making its way to the blood stream and then to its target site, and then being potent enough to be effective in its intended purpose.

If these cells are living, which they are, it would make complete sense in this layman's mind, that routinely subjecting these cells to an environment, (our blood) that isn't necessarily "hospitable", but not toxic (saturated with tki) , could allow or provoke the diseased entities to adapt/mutate to obtain survival.

Those of us concerned or passing blame for the disease toward benzene and radiation exposure, might embrace this idea more, as this would likely be how the disease initiated. Repeat exposures- although not enough or potent enough to kill us immediately, were enough to cause a mutation, and the disease..


Eh.

Possibly those with lower disease amounts within their bodies, are successful on lowering dosage, because the ratio remains correct of drug:disease. If someone with more leukemia stem cells or more active ones, reduced dosage, it might not "keep up" ? I don't know. So once at pcru or very, very low, the disease amount is lessened, and likely to a point that the drug:disease ratio can be sustained fine with a lower dose, but it is pretty much a guess what that "safe dose" is.


So me, with my paranoia and logic, (and slower initial response) will elect to stay on a recommended dose of a tki, so long as it's safe, viable and attainable, without argument.
3/25/2015- Dx'ed by FISH : 85% of cells dual-fusion signals, 7% with tri-fusion signals, WBC 212,000. Started Gleevec 400mg.... Calculated .93 SOKAL

08/17/2015- 14.793 % I.S P210 (quest)
10/15/2015- 3.313 % I.S (quest)
12/23/2015- 1.891 % I.S (quest)
1/07/2016- Tasigna 300mg 2x daily
1/14/2016- 4.414 % I.S P210- City Of Hope lab, mutation negative.
1/26/2016- 1.589 % I.S (quest)
2/22/2016- 1.719 % I.S (quest)
2/29/2016- 1.133 % I.S (quest)
3/03/2016- Tasigna 400mg 2x daily.
3/29/2016- 0.663 % I.S (quest)
4/27/2016- 0.781 % I.S (quest)
5/04/2016- 0.652 % I.S.(quest)
5/24/2016- 0.501 % I.S (quest)
6/28/2016-0.534 % I.S (quest)
7/15/2016-0.881 % I.S (quest)
7/22/2016- Bosulif 500mg
7/28/2016- t315i test- Negative
8/22/2016-0.432 % I.S (quest )
11/15/2016-0.325 % I.S (quest)
2/1/2017- .0445% i.s (genoptix)
5/6/2017- .0968% i.s (genoptix)
5/12/2017- .12 % i.s (quest).
6/4/2017- .083% i.s (quest)
6/11/2017- .0295% i.s (genoptix)
8/5/2017- .0501% i.s (genoptix)
11/6/2017- .0270% i.s (genoptix)

#19 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 15 June 2016 - 05:18 AM

Definitely have your water checked, if it is contaminated, it could lead to other types of blood cancers.  Water filters are supposed to filter out Benzene so if you don't have them, might want to pick some up.  

 

If you do a search on Benzene in well water, you will find tons of articles about contaminated well water.  Also, fracking has lead to many well water sources becoming contaminated with Benzene.


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#20 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 15 June 2016 - 04:29 PM

I'm with thatguy... LOL I will stick to what they give me.


10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users