Jump to content


Photo

LLS New Site -- Major Changes, But Are They What We Need?

L&LS New Site

  • Please log in to reply
129 replies to this topic

#41 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 26 January 2016 - 01:45 PM

get the rope ... 


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#42 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 26 January 2016 - 01:49 PM

Interesting ... I agree with Trey. Now I am concerned.

 

Hopefully LLS is taking our feedback to heart and will postpone or abort their planned move from the current structure to the new one. If not - Perhaps an alternative discussion board can be set up so proper thread control and topic titles can be continued.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#43 missjoy

missjoy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 26 January 2016 - 02:25 PM

I wonder how useful the information LLS would gather from the discussion board. LLS could get all information needed if oncologists and hospitals report and share information with research institutes. We,users only post isolated information regarding questions asked. We do not need the latest technology but a place to get support from folks who have similar experience. Whoever pays for the service does not change the reason why the board exists .

#44 xGunner

xGunner

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts
  • LocationDes Moines

Posted 26 January 2016 - 05:15 PM

It appears that you have to be completely registered in order to see any of the posts.  Given the nature of the required fields, you need to be prepared to either have a throw-away email account to catch the likely spam that will come forth, plus they are asking for a lot of information that many folks should not be posting without considering the potential impact.

 

Newly diagnosed folks are looking for information about how to deal with CML and what to expect. I'm not sure I would jump through the hoops plus give up all that information without ever seeing what is on the boards.



#45 MarCap73

MarCap73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 26 January 2016 - 06:45 PM

I just want to come to a site where I can learn more about what other CMLers are going through, search through various prior posts about topics relevant to me and maybe add my 2 cents once in a while.

 

I think that sums up precisely what most of us are looking for! 


Dx: 11/2015

Sprycel: 100mg

 

May-17: 0.0095% IS

Aug-17: 0.0048% IS

Nov-17: 0.0066% IS

 

 


#46 MarCap73

MarCap73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 26 January 2016 - 06:55 PM

I received an email response as well stating. " I would very much like to speak with you concerning your insights as well as sharing with you the bigger picture of what is planned."

 

An update: I didn't speak with LLS but sent a response to them along with my opinion on the new site.  I received a second reply thanking me and stating "thank you so much for your review, thoughtful comments, and constructive critiques.  We are going to take these to heart and will do our best to accommodate all the suggestions we received."

 

Additionally, I was provided with a link to a YouTube video meant to provide a high level overview of the direction they are going in. The link is to a power point video being narrated by a staffer.  It's an unlisted video as of right now so I am not going to post the link.  I don't want to stir the pot too much (yet) and be banished to the The Discussion Board Penalty Box by LLS.  It will be public soon enough, I think.  

 

Just commenting on one slide here (The Privacy Statement) and when you see the video yourselves, note this.

  •  "The more you share the more we can learn and drive change." 
  •  ​"We will store the information you chose to share in a safe place".  (Well that's not a very convincing statement... Target said the same thing.)
  • "The info may be used to provide you with personalized information."  
  • "We will never conduct scientific research without getting your consent"  (After hearing that said on the video I am even more convinced that LLS is doing nothing but trying to grab personal data for it's own purposes.)

Dx: 11/2015

Sprycel: 100mg

 

May-17: 0.0095% IS

Aug-17: 0.0048% IS

Nov-17: 0.0066% IS

 

 


#47 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 27 January 2016 - 09:44 AM

L&LS has heard our inputs and has decided to keep the current Discussion Boards open.  They will open the second site and see if it is useful for some purposes.  This is great news and shows us the L&LS is supportive of our needs. 

 

Quoting the L&LS response to our concerns:

 

"LLS has taken your input to heart and has decided to continue to support and allow current and new users to post to and review posts from the current discussion board site.  The URL will stay the same.  In essence, we heard you, want to support you, and are committed to doing so. 

Having said that, we are still planning to release the new Community site beginning Feb 1. As you can understand, some folks have different needs and interests and we want to provide options.  A constituent can choose to be a part of the current discussion boards, or the new Community, or they can join both or neither.  The choice is up to the person.

We will, of course be monitoring both sites to provide support on each."   

 

So all is well, and we are GRATEFUL to L&LS leadership for stepping in and making an excellent decision which benefits the Patients. 



#48 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 27 January 2016 - 10:07 AM

Very good - they reached a correct decision.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#49 Kellyb333

Kellyb333

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 27 January 2016 - 10:13 AM

I am so grateful!!

#50 Kali

Kali

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts

Posted 27 January 2016 - 11:18 AM

Thank you LLS for keeping this discussion board. This means a lot to us!

Diagnosed June 2014. WBC 34.6 and Platelets 710 at diagnosis. Bone Marrow Biopsy pre-op diagnosis: Leukocytosis. Post-op diagnosis: the same, Leukocytosis. No increase in blasts <1%. Quantitative BCR/ABL testing and formal chromosome analyses confirmed CML diagnosis.<p>Supplemental Report: Abnormal BCR/ABL1 FISH result t(9;22). Molecular test for BCR/ABL1 fusion transcript by RT-PCR positive for BCR/ABL1 transcripts, b3a2 at 133.561% and b2a2 at 0.001% and ela2 at 0.001%. Followup monitoring showed negative for ela2. BCRABL1 was 148.007 at diagnosis. Started Sprycel 100 mgm and blood work was normal at 3 weeks. MMR at 3 months: 10/4/14 was 0.106. Stayed in that range with one dip to 0.04 once and back to 0.1 range. Oct. 2015, BCRABL1 was not detected, following with 0.0126, 0.0092, <0.0069, 0.0000, <0.0069, 0.0000. Now on 70 mgm of Sprycel. Continuation of PCR test results: 07/07/2017, 0.0000%, now on 50 mgm of Sprycel, PCR 9/12/17 0.0074%, PCR 11/3/17 0.0000%, PCR 1/17/2018 0.0000%


#51 soundoff

soundoff

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 129 posts

Posted 27 January 2016 - 11:59 AM

Great news

#52 kat73

kat73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 884 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC area

Posted 27 January 2016 - 12:02 PM

Whew.  Thank you Trey and everyone else who helped bring about this very sensible outcome.  I didn't post because I am too computer-ignorant to even evaluate or critique - I am so grateful that there are better heads than mine who spotted and delineated the inherent flaws in the new approach.  To lose this place, operating the way it does currently, would have killed my spirit.


Dx July 2009 on routine physical.  WBC 94.  Started Gleevec 400 mg Sept 2009.  MMR at 2yrs.  Side effects (malaise, depression/anxiety, fatigue, nausea, periorbital edema) never improved.  Kidney issues developed because of Gleevec.  Switched to Sprycel 70 mg in Aug 2011.  Above side effects disappeared or improved.  Have been MR3.5 - 4.5 ever since.  Two untreated pleural effusions followed by one treated by stopping Sprycel Jan 2017.  After 9 weeks, PCR showed loss of MMR; re-started Sprycel at 50 mg and in 3 months was back to <0.01% IS.  Pleural effusion returned within a couple of months, same as before (moderate, left side only).  Stopped Sprycel 50 mg for 12 weeks; pleural effusion resolved.  At about a monthoff the drug, PCR was 0.03; at 11 weeks it was 2.06 - lost CCyR? Have returned to 50 mg Sprycel for 3 weeks, intending to reduce to 20 mg going forward.


#53 mamawarrior

mamawarrior

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 611 posts

Posted 27 January 2016 - 06:22 PM

Thank you trey for informing us on the transplant forum of the proposed changes so that we could voice our opinions as well. We have some really sick folks, relapsing and going through chemo again,  that are in no position to express their opinion, let alone learn the ropes of a new forum. Heck some are probably finding it very difficult if not impossible to post a few words right now. But hopefully when they are better, they can find their way back to the forums, see their notes of support, instead of wondering what the heck happened and where did the site go. 

 

So glad that LALS heard our concerns. 



#54 roamingdoc83

roamingdoc83

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 45 posts

Posted 30 January 2016 - 12:53 PM

Whew!

Contemplating "ruining something great"... even in the face of so many complaints... (hmm, sounds like our government)

 

Glad they listened, glad they are keeping the current format. BE ON THE LOOKOUT for anything that might change in the 'background!'

 

Good JOB Trey!



#55 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 01 April 2016 - 06:25 PM

I was curious how things were going on the other "discussion" page.  It sounds like things aren't great for people who've been away for a while and want to reconnect with us.  I sent a message with a link to this page to vwoyak.  Hopefully they'll get it and check in back here.

 

I copied some of the interaction vwoyak had with LLS staffers and pasted it below.  I guess they don't want to refer old timers back to this page.

 

 

vwoyak

in

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia  

4 days ago

 

Wow! I have not been on here in a very long time and things have really changed! I hope to reconnect with some old friends (as soon as I figure out how to find them) and make a few new ones as well. I think I will be doing a bit of lurking until I get the hang of this new set up. In the mean time, hello everyone!

 

May  

2 days ago

 

Hi vwoyak, welcome to LLS Community!

 

vwoyak  

2 days ago

 

thank you May, but I will be unsubscribing. I do not see how the new "facebook" format is conducive to the free flow of sharing between members on specific topics/questions/ideas that it once was. I feel I can be of more help to those just beginning their journeys on other forums.

 

 

vwoyak  

4 days ago

 

Hadn't been on here for quite a while. Not what I was hoping to find. Appears to be great for anyone newly dxd and seeking articles, etc. but no longer really set up for "chatting" with your peers or sharing experience and support as it once was. I look at the dates/times on the comments and it's one here one there. Reminds me of a small group of individuals trying to communicate with one another from different corners of an empty auditorium. Since this no longer offers me any more contact, info and updates than I can get from my email inbox, I am going back to my other groups. At least now I understand the feedback I was getting from the "new" folks I was routing here. I will be eternally grateful for the love and support I received on the old site. The beginning of my journey so many years ago would have been so much harder without all those great folks who selflessly shared and offered a supportive hand and later gave me the opportunity to "pay it forward". Why am I left with the feeling like an old friend had passed away?

 

Julie14  

3 days ago

 

Hi vwoyak welcome! FYI you can join your forums of interest in the Groups tab up top, depending on who you would like to chat with. Thanks for being here to support others!

 

 

 


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#56 VickiW

VickiW

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • Locationnorthwoods

Posted 01 April 2016 - 08:36 PM

Hi Kirk!  thank you so much for the link!  There is no way I would have otherwise known that the original forums still existed  :angry:

Already seen some familiar names.  Great to know they are still here.  I am sure that I am not the only one who is grateful to Trey for much of my early education.  Thank you once again, now I am off to find some more old friends and see if I can make a few new ones.

 

eta;  noticed much of my original profile info is missing (20 posts, really?  I was a total chatterbox but then a lot was lost when they did the previous "update") At least they didn't delete me completely  :rolleyes:


Dxd 2007

started on Gleevec switched to Sprycel 100mg in 2009

PCRU since 2011

20mg Sprycel every other day since Dec. 2014

Began TFR 4-18-16


#57 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 01 April 2016 - 10:32 PM

I'm glad you found your way back!  I wonder why the LLS folks didn't mention that we're still here? :huh:


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#58 MarCap73

MarCap73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 22 April 2016 - 11:08 AM

I got an email from apparently one of the site admins today:

 

-----------------------------------

Hi XXXX,

 

Thank you for your support on LLS Community! I wanted to reach out to confirm the birthday question on your profile, it states as 12/25/1900, age of 115.

 

Best,

 

XXXX

-----------------------------------------

 

This raises an alarm in my mind and one of the concerns I had brought up, it comes across as a grab to gather as much personal info on users as they can, build profiles on users, and target marketing.  

 

Ummmm, yeah....I am 115... :rolleyes:  :wacko:


Dx: 11/2015

Sprycel: 100mg

 

May-17: 0.0095% IS

Aug-17: 0.0048% IS

Nov-17: 0.0066% IS

 

 


#59 Antilogical

Antilogical

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 284 posts
  • LocationPittsburgh, PA

Posted 22 April 2016 - 01:35 PM

Congratulations on reaching such an advanced age, MarCap.  You don't look a day over 73.


Dx: Sudden severe anemia detected 07/2011, followed by WBC spike. CML Dx 02/2012.

Rx: 03/2012-Gleevec400.  Reduced 02/2013 to Gleevec300 due to side effects (low blood counts).

Response: PCR-Und within 7 mo. on G400. Maintained MMR4-MMR4.5 on G300. PCR-Und since 02/2016.


#60 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 22 April 2016 - 02:07 PM

These TKI's really work. I'd be thrilled to make it to 115! Who knew that the drugs not only hold back CML but they actually extend our lives beyond the normal lifespan. Awesome! ;)


10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users