Jump to content


Photo

LLS New Site -- Major Changes, But Are They What We Need?

L&LS New Site

  • Please log in to reply
129 replies to this topic

#1 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 19 January 2016 - 09:05 PM

L&LS has put a link on the top of the Discussion Boards regarding "Get Ready for LLS Community".  It can also be seen here:

http://community.lls...-lls-community/

 

https://communityvie...yeloid-leukemia

 

I have looked at the new site and am severely disappointed.  I asked if it will replace this current Discussion Board, and the answer was "Yes". 

 

The new site is set up pretty much like Facebook.  It is a social media format.  It is disorganized, random, and cluttered.  Here are some of the comments I sent to L&LS Admin:

 

Overall the site is cluttered.  Too much stuff we don't care about.  It seems this new site is trying to offer too much information when the user wants to control what is seen to reduce the clutter.  In the future when a lot of users are signed up this clutter will ,ake the site even more burdensome to use.  The simple listing of discussions with most recent ones first works very well on the existing L&LS Discussion Board. 

On social media sites the clutter, randomness and disorganization may work.  The social media model does not work for a Discussion Board.  Social media format is not the answer for every website.  It certainly does not work here.

Overall assessment:  Cluttered, random and disorganized, this new site breaks all the features that make the current Discussion Boards work well.  This is not social media -- that concept is a failure here.  I give this attempt a D- grade.  Starting over would be a very good idea.  Better yet, leave the existing site alone. 

Remember who your audience is.  We are an average age of about 55 years old.  We did not grow up with social media.  We would use social media if it worked better, and we could set up our own apart from LLS, but we don't want a social media concept.  We are your CUSTOMER.  We are grateful that you have provided the existing LLS Discussion Board since 2009, and an earlier version before that.  It works very well for us.  It has greatly benefited many hundreds of people looking for help.  This new site will not work well for us, and it would be a disservice to LLS patients everywhere.  So if you care about us, you will NOT implement this new site. 

I don't mind new as long as it is better.  I also don't criticize just to criticize.  This site is not better in any way we patients care about.  It breaks just about everything that helps patients on the existing Boards.  I don't see the point in making such a large scale change to the highly successful L&LS Discussion Boards which have helped so many patients over the years. 

I wish I could say something more upbeat, but that would not reflect my opinions.  This new site is a disaster.  My suggestion is that L&LS should keep the existing Discussion Boards and add this new site for whatever new purpose it intends, which frankly I don't see what that is.  Maybe someone could explain it to me.

 

So that was my input to L&LS on the new site.  They apparently intend to implement this within a few weeks.  So sad to see L&LS destroy something that has been so useful for L&LS patients. 


Edited by Trey, 20 January 2016 - 10:27 AM.


#2 soundoff

soundoff

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 129 posts

Posted 19 January 2016 - 09:46 PM

Typical of LLS not to care.
The chat is the same BS the moderator has no clue of the 1st amendment. Trey I'll back you up and make some phone calls tomorrow. I'm tired of the BS.

#3 Harper3994

Harper3994

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts
  • LocationTrinity, Florida

Posted 19 January 2016 - 09:49 PM

I am new to the forum and asking please do not change anything. It is so important for all of us to be able to have consistency. We have had enough changes in our life..it's called CML.

#4 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 19 January 2016 - 10:07 PM

It is good as it is. A better search engine is all it needs.

10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#5 Tucker1

Tucker1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 48 posts

Posted 19 January 2016 - 10:40 PM

I never use a social media site just as Trey said they are too cluttered and you have to wade through a lot of stuff that is useless and annoying. I like the site the way it is, why did they decide to change it?
Dx: 11/2004 intermediate risk 400 mg Gleevec
11/2005 partial cytogenetic response PCR 6.3
Clinical trial Sprycel 50mg 2x daily 12/05
11/06 PCR weak positive
10/07 PCR undetectable
12/08 PCR .017
Recurring colitis from Sprycel
11/09 Tasigna PCR .0075 200 mg 2x daily
11/10 PCR .078 400 mg 2x daily
11/11PCR weak positive
2/12 PCR. .15 decrease 200 mg 2x (QT prolongation)
Dosage changes until 2015 QT recurrent PCR .004
7/15 bosulif 500 mg
Liver toxicity discontinued bosulif PCR .025
Restart bosulif 100mg
12/15 PCR .714
Increase bosulif slowly
2/16 PCR.5
5/16 PCR .000 bosuitinib 400mg
8/16 PCR .027 Bosuitinib 300mg
10/16 PCR .117 Bosuitinib 300mg
1/17 PCR .243 Bousitinib 300mg
4/17 PCR .403

#6 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 20 January 2016 - 06:21 AM

I too am not a fan of the social media format, love message boards but it seems they are going the way of the Dodo.  Impossible to find any useful information on the social media pages, cluttered with garbage.  I do use Facebook but the only reason is to keep in touch with old friends and schedule get togethers with family and current friends.  I doubt any amount of complaining will change their minds though.


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#7 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 20 January 2016 - 06:36 AM

I agree I doubt there is anything we can do. It is too bad. This has been a real valuable tool to have in helping deal with my CML. Trey, thanks for speaking up for us.

10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#8 hannibellemo

hannibellemo

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 728 posts
  • LocationNorth Central Iowa

Posted 20 January 2016 - 07:13 AM

I have tried CML sites on facebook and find them impossible to have a discussion. Everyone's comments are out of sync and I never know which comments go together. As was said earlier, if I wanted that type of website I'd use facebook. That's why I come here, instead. 

 

I foresee the end of my beloved discussion board if they move forward with this.


Pat

 

"You can't change the direction of the wind but you can adjust your sails."

DX 12/08; Gleevec 400mg; liver toxicity; Sprycel 100mg.; CCyR 4/10; MMR 8/10; Pleural Effusion 2/12; Sprycel 50mg. Maintaining MMR; 2/15 PCRU; 8/16 drifting in and out of undetected like a wave meeting the shore. Retired 12/23/2016! 18 months of PCRU, most recent at Mayo on 7/25/17 was negative at their new sensitivity reporting of 0.003.<p>


#9 rct

rct

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 77 posts

Posted 20 January 2016 - 08:20 AM

Yeah.  Won't that be great first time someone here walks into a meeting they drug themselves into work for and some joker says "hey is that you on that lymphotosis or whatever it is facebook I saw the other day?".

 

Should go well for everyone.

 

FACEPALM.

 

rct



#10 missjoy

missjoy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 122 posts

Posted 20 January 2016 - 08:22 AM

Patients and their families are the users.LLS should meet its users needs and listen to its users. Can we do something to stop them from implementing it?

#11 blueheron

blueheron

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 33 posts

Posted 20 January 2016 - 08:44 AM

The new site is a solution in search of a problem. It's very sad to see these boards go by the wayside. My status right now is PO'ed!


DX 6/2013

Sprycel 100mg

CCR 3/2015

MMR 2/2016

<.01 IS 10/16 hopkins didn't report actual percentage

.007 IS 6/2017

<.01 12/2017 again no actual percentage but didn't see the report myself yet


#12 Harper3994

Harper3994

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 56 posts
  • LocationTrinity, Florida

Posted 20 January 2016 - 09:12 AM

I have been relying on this site since I was diagnosed and really need it since doctors don't have time to explain things. Please leave as is. I am not on Facebook...don't know how to use a lot of this social media stuff.

#13 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 20 January 2016 - 09:30 AM

like Facebook, the new site will try to pick up every bit of marketing information they can.  don't divulge anything.  


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#14 Kali

Kali

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts

Posted 20 January 2016 - 09:36 AM

I am fairly new to this site but had read it since my diagnosis the summer of 2014. This site and Treys blog are the only two things that helped my fears, my grief over this diagnosis and gave me hope. The information I learned was so valuable because my onc told me little to nothing and it was this board who gave me a wealth of information. This board is very user friendly and made it simple to get information. That meant a lot to me with all the stress and lack of energy. The reason I took so long to join was because I am a very private person and only my family and 3 friends know I have this disease. I used to have a Facebook account and got rid of it because of no privacy. I don't like social media. Not sure why they want to go to a social media website but that would be horrendous. Is our discussion board not sacred? If it is not broke why fix it? confidentiality is sacred. I do not want myself or anyone to feel vulnerable in sharing information and having discussion on here. A social media format would be a disaster for several reasons in my opinion. we live in a society that likes to broadcast everything about everybody. I believe our health is something that we can be private about but also network with one another to provide support and help. The agenda of social media is the opposite of protecting our privacy.

Diagnosed June 2014. WBC 34.6 and Platelets 710 at diagnosis. Bone Marrow Biopsy pre-op diagnosis: Leukocytosis. Post-op diagnosis: the same, Leukocytosis. No increase in blasts <1%. Quantitative BCR/ABL testing and formal chromosome analyses confirmed CML diagnosis.<p>Supplemental Report: Abnormal BCR/ABL1 FISH result t(9;22). Molecular test for BCR/ABL1 fusion transcript by RT-PCR positive for BCR/ABL1 transcripts, b3a2 at 133.561% and b2a2 at 0.001% and ela2 at 0.001%. Followup monitoring showed negative for ela2. BCRABL1 was 148.007 at diagnosis. Started Sprycel 100 mgm and blood work was normal at 3 weeks. MMR at 3 months: 10/4/14 was 0.106. Stayed in that range with one dip to 0.04 once and back to 0.1 range. Oct. 2015, BCRABL1 was not detected, following with 0.0126, 0.0092, <0.0069, 0.0000, <0.0069, 0.0000. Now on 70 mgm of Sprycel. Continuation of PCR test results: 07/07/2017, 0.0000%, now on 50 mgm of Sprycel, PCR 9/12/17 0.0074%, PCR 11/3/17 0.0000%, PCR 1/17/2018 0.0000%


#15 Kali

Kali

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts

Posted 20 January 2016 - 09:47 AM

The more I think about this, I will bet money is driving this change. Maybe they think a social media format will generate more donations. Just a thought since money drives the world we live in.
The social media format is a bad idea anyway you look at it for us, the patients.

Diagnosed June 2014. WBC 34.6 and Platelets 710 at diagnosis. Bone Marrow Biopsy pre-op diagnosis: Leukocytosis. Post-op diagnosis: the same, Leukocytosis. No increase in blasts <1%. Quantitative BCR/ABL testing and formal chromosome analyses confirmed CML diagnosis.<p>Supplemental Report: Abnormal BCR/ABL1 FISH result t(9;22). Molecular test for BCR/ABL1 fusion transcript by RT-PCR positive for BCR/ABL1 transcripts, b3a2 at 133.561% and b2a2 at 0.001% and ela2 at 0.001%. Followup monitoring showed negative for ela2. BCRABL1 was 148.007 at diagnosis. Started Sprycel 100 mgm and blood work was normal at 3 weeks. MMR at 3 months: 10/4/14 was 0.106. Stayed in that range with one dip to 0.04 once and back to 0.1 range. Oct. 2015, BCRABL1 was not detected, following with 0.0126, 0.0092, <0.0069, 0.0000, <0.0069, 0.0000. Now on 70 mgm of Sprycel. Continuation of PCR test results: 07/07/2017, 0.0000%, now on 50 mgm of Sprycel, PCR 9/12/17 0.0074%, PCR 11/3/17 0.0000%, PCR 1/17/2018 0.0000%


#16 Red Cross Kirk

Red Cross Kirk

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 173 posts
  • LocationOregon

Posted 20 January 2016 - 11:27 AM

I agree!  Please leave the discussion forums as they are.  As far as I can tell, they are working fine as they are currently configured.


Kirk

 

9/25/2012  p210 transcript 118.7% IS @ Dx, begin Gleevec 400mg/day
12/2012  3.59% & bone marrow biopsy - no residual myeloproliferative features but detected 1/20 metaphases containing the Philadelphia chromosome
2013  0.914%, 0.434%, 0.412%
10/2013  0.360% & bone marrow biopsy - normal male karyotype with no evidence of a clonal cytogenetic abnormaltiy
2014  0.174%, 0.088%, 0.064%

2015  0.049%, decrease to Gleevec 200mg/day, 0.035%, 0.061%, 0.028%

2016  0.041%, 0.039%, 0.025%

2017  0.029%, 0.039%, switched to generic imatinib 200mg/day, 0.070%, 0.088%

2018  0.233%


#17 Dona_B

Dona_B

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 104 posts

Posted 20 January 2016 - 01:54 PM

To the Administrators and those in charge:

I agree. If it isn't broke don't fix it. There are many sources of information on the web today. Here the information is user friendly and easy to understand. It's easy to check back on a particular thread for recent comments. And we can control how much personal info we wish to share.

 

Social media is good for general topics of interest but discussion boards work best for specific issues like health concerns, car issues, pet breed concerns, etc....


DX 1/14; Sprycel 100 Mg, liver toxicity; Sprycel 80 Mg; down to 50 Mg for 5 months. Numbers going up. Back to 80 Mg 10/16 (with 50s slipped in to use up) BCR/ABL: .0047 12/15; .0302 4/16;  .0528 8/16;  .084 10/16; .045, 1/17 back up on 80 mg Sprycel; .006, 3/17; .016, 7/17; Shingles 8/17


#18 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 20 January 2016 - 03:05 PM

the "Contact Us" button: http://www.lls.org/contact/contact-us


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#19 kat73

kat73

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 884 posts
  • LocationWashington, DC area

Posted 20 January 2016 - 04:07 PM

I agree completely with everything Kali said (and, see, you can just scroll up and read it again, easy). I have gotten more real help and information here than I ever have in six years gotten from all the doctors put together X 3.  And, like radio instead of Pandora, I never know what I'll find here - but it will be interesting and generate thoughts - with the bonus of sometimes being able to help someone else.  I don't do Facebook and never will.  Can't understand the appeal, for the life of me.  I'm too old and I like my privacy.  Even if the privacy loop were somehow closed, it's still not REPLYING to what someone said - you know, like a CONVERSATION.  It's like the difference between a billboard and a letter.  I agree, it's probably about fund-raising, but I also suspect it's because LLS hired a millenial to be cybermedia director and he/she was horrified to see how out-of-date we all are here.  Naturally, someone who does NOT have CML would NOT get it!  But, aside from jokes and some personal anecdotes, we don't come here to party, you know?  Can we sign a petition or something?  Can we deputize Trey to carry the sword?  Can we re-form ourselves in some other format so we don't lose each other?  I don't know what I will do - on my grimmest days, at least I had this.  I don't know how I will go on alone.


Dx July 2009 on routine physical.  WBC 94.  Started Gleevec 400 mg Sept 2009.  MMR at 2yrs.  Side effects (malaise, depression/anxiety, fatigue, nausea, periorbital edema) never improved.  Kidney issues developed because of Gleevec.  Switched to Sprycel 70 mg in Aug 2011.  Above side effects disappeared or improved.  Have been MR3.5 - 4.5 ever since.  Two untreated pleural effusions followed by one treated by stopping Sprycel Jan 2017.  After 9 weeks, PCR showed loss of MMR; re-started Sprycel at 50 mg and in 3 months was back to <0.01% IS.  Pleural effusion returned within a couple of months, same as before (moderate, left side only).  Stopped Sprycel 50 mg for 12 weeks; pleural effusion resolved.  At about a monthoff the drug, PCR was 0.03; at 11 weeks it was 2.06 - lost CCyR? Have returned to 50 mg Sprycel for 3 weeks, intending to reduce to 20 mg going forward.


#20 SUE

SUE

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 109 posts
  • LocationChicago

Posted 21 January 2016 - 10:19 AM

This forum is absolutely essential for us.  The knowledge and experiences shared and the questions answered have enabled me to understand my disease and to intelligently discuss my treatment with my Oncologist.  Also, as kat73 says, we have the emotional support and closeness from our fellow CMLers that is so necessary to help us cope.

 

If LLS takes this away, we must figure out another way to continue our forum.

 

Sue


Dx  April 2013, FISH 62,  BMB not enough for PCR test; put on Gleevec 400;

 August 2013, FISH 8.7;

Oct 2013, FISH 5.6

Stopped Gleevec Nov 2013 for 6 weeks due to terrible side effects; Jan 2014 started Sprycel 50mg;

Feb, 2014 PCR  6.8

May,2014  PCR   .149

Aug, 2014 PCR    .015

Nov. 2014 PCRU

March, 2016  went down to 40mg Sprycel

Oct. 2016   stopped Sprycel for a couple weeks due to concern about shortness of breath.  Echo showed mild PAH.

Nov 1 2016  resumed Sprycel 20 mg daily 

Dec 2016  PCRU

March 2017  PCR 0.020

May 2017     PCRU

Sept  2017   PCRU

Dec    2017  PCRU

 





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users