Jump to content


Photo

Bone Marrow Biopsies: How many have you had?

BMB CML remission Bone pain

  • Please log in to reply
50 replies to this topic

#1 Dona_B

Dona_B

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 104 posts

Posted 23 February 2015 - 05:11 PM

Conducting a survey. How many BMB have you had per year? And the commulative total since diagnosis?

 

It's that time again--the quarterly appointment with my onc. It's been not quite 14 months and I've had two BMBs and he wants to do a third. I was able to postpone it last quarter but he think's it's the only way to tell if I reach CML remission. I probably wouldn't mind so much if I didn't already have back issues. Personally as long as the BCR-ABL numbers continue to come down, I don't think it's necessary.

 

Bonus question does any one else have almost unbearable back pain when on feet for more than a few hours? Familiar with the bone pain as side effects but seems like it would show up other places as well.

 

I don't know if the back issues are preexisting from a herniated disk and bulging disks (last MRI over a year ago said they were resolving), other hereditary, Sprycel bone pain, or from BMB.  If my back gets any worse, it's going to be a quantity of life vs quality. Between my back issues and certain female issues I'll spare you,  CML seems minor in comparison.

 


DX 1/14; Sprycel 100 Mg, liver toxicity; Sprycel 80 Mg; down to 50 Mg for 5 months. Numbers going up. Back to 80 Mg 10/16 (with 50s slipped in to use up) BCR/ABL: .0047 12/15; .0302 4/16;  .0528 8/16;  .084 10/16; .045, 1/17 back up on 80 mg Sprycel; .006, 3/17; .016, 7/17; Shingles 8/17


#2 rcase13

rcase13

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 523 posts
  • LocationCharlotte, NC

Posted 23 February 2015 - 05:28 PM

Diagnosed 10/2014
One BMB so far. Wasn't too bad. The nurse said I can let her do it or the doctor could do it. She said if I do it there will be very little discomfort. She said the doctor would not be as careful. I let her do it and it was not too bad.

10/01/2014 100% Diagnosis (WBC 278k, Blasts 6%, Spleen extended 20cm)

01/02/2015 0.06% Tasigna 600mg
04/08/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
07/01/2015 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
10/05/2015 0.02% Tasigna 600mg
01/04/2016 0.01% Tasigna 600mg
04/04/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
07/18/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/12/2016 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/09/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
04/12/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
10/16/2017 PCRU Tasigna 600mg
01/15/2018 PCRU Tasigna 600mg

 

Cancer Sucks!


#3 JPD

JPD

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 258 posts

Posted 23 February 2015 - 05:46 PM

One, right after diagnosis, Nov 2013.  Last PCR .50%.

 

is another in order?


January 15: .53%

April 15:       .78%

July 15:      1.1% - upped dosage to 400mg after this test

Oct 15:       .85%

December 15:  .28%

March 16: .29%

July 16: .34%

October 16: .11%

January 17: .081%

April 17: .055%

July 17: .135%

Oct 17: .008%


#4 soundoff

soundoff

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 129 posts

Posted 23 February 2015 - 06:06 PM

I wouldn't do it. PCR test is fine. But that's just me....

#5 Floa7

Floa7

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 53 posts
  • Locationindiana

Posted 23 February 2015 - 06:09 PM

My son was diagnosed, Nov 2012, He had one right after diagnosis.

 

I was diagnosed in Jan 2013, I have had only one BMB when diagnosed. Doc numbed my hip, First two times were ok but the third attempt to get more bone marrow, do I need too say more the numbing had wore off.. 

 

We both went resistant to Gleevec. He is on Sprycel and I am now on Tasigna. I get blood work in 3 weeks.

 

I was already reading this site by the time I got diagnosed.


1 2012 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

In nov 2014 my pcr started to rise by Feb I stopped Gleevec and went onto

2 2015 Tasigna 600 mg/day

I have been PCRU for 2 years and stopped Tasigna 4 7 2017

5 8 2017 results 0.008

5 30 2017 results 0.028 

6 30 2017 results 0.3, I have restarted the Tasigna because it went above 0.1 

 

My son

11 2011 CML detected Started Gleevec 400 mg

He went 2 1/2 years on gleevec and lost PCRU

Started Sprycel went PCRU for 2 years and stopped the Sprycel, went back for 3 month checkup and PCR was 8.0

He went back onto Sprycel and now is PCRU again

3 16 2017 results 0.008

6 1 2017 results 0.002


#6 Dana

Dana

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 23 February 2015 - 07:28 PM

I have only had one right after diagnosis and that has been 12 years ago.

#7 pammartin

pammartin

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 631 posts
  • LocationPennsylvania

Posted 23 February 2015 - 07:34 PM

I have had 3 in 3 years. First was at diagnosis, last two were when I changed oncologists and facilites. Both West Penn & Cleveland Clinic wanted their own results although they did review previous slides.

#8 Antilogical

Antilogical

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 284 posts
  • LocationPittsburgh, PA

Posted 23 February 2015 - 07:48 PM

Diagnosis: 02/2012

BMB:  02/2012

BMB:  02/2013

 

According to my hem/onc, a BMB at diagnosis and at 1 year are all that is needed, unless a mutation is suspected.

 

My neighbor also has CML, and has a different hem/onc in the same hospital/insurance system.  He has NEVER had a BMB.  His doc just uses the PCR test.


Dx: Sudden severe anemia detected 07/2011, followed by WBC spike. CML Dx 02/2012.

Rx: 03/2012-Gleevec400.  Reduced 02/2013 to Gleevec300 due to side effects (low blood counts).

Response: PCR-Und within 7 mo. on G400. Maintained MMR4-MMR4.5 on G300. PCR-Und since 02/2016.


#9 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 23 February 2015 - 09:10 PM

 A BMB is useless after CCyR / 2 log reduction PCR (1.0% IS) / zero FISH. 



#10 Dom

Dom

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 186 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey

Posted 23 February 2015 - 09:48 PM

I had one at diagnosis, but it was only a bone marrow aspiration, much less painful because, as I undberstand it, it does not chip the bone itself. He suggested another bnb (or bma?) one year later, which is this month, but is backing off now because the pcr test doesn't warrant it. I'm surprised the op is getting a third.

Diagnosed in February 2014. Started Imatinib 400 in April.
2014:     3.18     0.91
2015:     0.22     0.16     0.04     0.55
2016:     0.71     0.66

(Started Imatinib 600 in April 2016)
2016:     0.42     0.13     0.45
2017:     0.17     0.06     0.10     0.06     0.34


#11 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 23 February 2015 - 10:16 PM

Just to clarify BMB vs BMA, a BMA (aspiration) can be done without taking a core sample of marrow and bone, but I don't know why that would be done without also doing a BMB core sample.  To get an aspirate sample a hole must be punctured into the hip bone to suck out fluid.  That puncturing is also what a core sample for cytogenetics analysis (bone core/chip) does, but it takes a very tiny bit of bone and marrow structure with it as a core sample.  A smaller aspirate needle can be used, but to what purpose?  Doing that without a marrow core sample at the same time does not make much sense.  Both feel about the same, and both puncture the bone. 



#12 Billie Murawski

Billie Murawski

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 711 posts
  • LocationErie,Pa

Posted 23 February 2015 - 11:11 PM

One BMB at dx 2007



#13 Buzzm1

Buzzm1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 972 posts
  • LocationSilicon Valley

Posted 24 February 2015 - 01:31 AM

the first and the last, Feb. 2010 ... 


For the benefit of yourself and others please add your CML history into your Signature

 

02/2010 Gleevec 400mg

2011 Two weakly positives, PCRU, weakly positive

2012 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU

2013 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, weakly positive

2014 PCRU, PCRU, PCRU, PCRU (12/07 began dose reduction w/each continuing PCRU)

2015 300, 250, 200, 150

2016 100, 50/100, 100, 10/17 TFR

2017 01/17 TFR, 04/18 TFR, 07/18 TFR 0.0012, 08/29 TFR 0.001, 10/17 TFR 0.000

2018 01/16 TFR 0.0004 ... next quarterly PCR 04/17

 

At the earliest opportunity, and whenever possible, lower your TKI dosage; TKIs are toxic drugs and the less we take longterm the better off we are going to be ... this is especially true for older adults.  

 

In hindsight I should have started my dosage reduction two years earlier; it might have helped minimize some of the longterm cumulative toxic effects of TKIs that I am beset with.  

 

longterm side-effects Peripheral Artery Disease - legs (it's a bitch); continuing shoulder problems, right elbow inflammation.   GFR and creatinine vastly improved after stopping Gleevec.

 

Cumulative Gleevec dosage estimated at 830 grams

 

Taking Gleevec 400mg an hour after my largest meal of the day helped eliminate the nausea that Gleevec is notorious for.  

 

Trey's CML BlogStopping - The OddsStop Studies - Discussion Forum Cessation Study

Big PhRMA - Medicare Status - Social Security Status - Deficit/Debt


#14 PhilB

PhilB

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts

Posted 24 February 2015 - 04:11 AM

One at diagnosis and another about 6 months later.  No point in having more if you have a good response.  My first was literally at diagnosis - ten minutes after the doctor I thought was going to tell me I had flu told me I had Leukaemia.  I have to say the shock worked very well as an anaesthetic.

If you want to feel like a wimp, wait until someone who was in the early trials comes along and tells you how many they had!



#15 Tedsey

Tedsey

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 85 posts

Posted 24 February 2015 - 05:27 AM

3 or 4 in the last 5 years. Hmmm. I always thought that was a lot. As horrible as they were with just a local, it is curious that I cannot remember the exact number. But at the very least, 3.

#16 Lucas

Lucas

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 215 posts

Posted 24 February 2015 - 06:59 AM

just one bmb - at dx - but had a bma at 3 months, 7 months and 12 months (CCyR finally!). Now, because of the trisomy 8 in the ph negative cells i'll have to have 1 bma per year.



#17 Cathy

Cathy

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 64 posts
  • LocationWilloughby oh

Posted 24 February 2015 - 08:01 AM

Hi, I've had 3 in 4 1/2 years

 

Cathy


Cathy

 

DX 5-2010  Started normal hydra then Gleevec for 9 months stopped working

Tasigna after 5 pills pancreatis  numbers jumped up quickly

Started Sprycel 100, 8-2010  for a 3 years went down to 50 mg numbers at one point really jumped up quickly

currently on 70 mg for last 2-3 years trying to get onc to reduce dose Numbers never stabilize never MMR till 4-2017 bearly and jump up and down in and out of MMR stayed MMR for 3 months then

After 6 years on sprycel fluid on both lungs, drained still have some fluid on lungs, and currently off drug 4 months now

numbers lower then ever go figure I've never been this low of a number 

last 2 tests .0686 and .0181 !!

 


#18 nanakrauss2

nanakrauss2

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 24 February 2015 - 08:26 AM

One at diagnosis and one 18 months later. None since. Diagnosed in 2003. PCRU for over nine years.

 

Nancy



#19 Marnie

Marnie

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 396 posts

Posted 24 February 2015 - 09:03 AM

2 - one at diagnosis and one a few years later with new oncologist and after switching to Sprycel. 



#20 Dom

Dom

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 186 posts
  • LocationNew Jersey

Posted 24 February 2015 - 11:35 AM

Thanks, Trey, for the feedback.  Let me follow up, even though it is off-topic a little.

 

My oncologist went with bma instead of bmb because the previous month I had a stent surgery and I was still on blood thinners.  The hospital would not allow bmb for insurance reasons.  It was the administrators who said a bma was less likely to cause internal bleeding, and the oncologist went along with that.  He did say, however, that the only information he needed came from the aspiration.

 

I was prepared for the bma by a nurse who told me all sorts of horror stories about bleeding and black and blue marks etc, but when I informed her that it was only a bma she said, "That's much simpler".  


Diagnosed in February 2014. Started Imatinib 400 in April.
2014:     3.18     0.91
2015:     0.22     0.16     0.04     0.55
2016:     0.71     0.66

(Started Imatinib 600 in April 2016)
2016:     0.42     0.13     0.45
2017:     0.17     0.06     0.10     0.06     0.34






Also tagged with one or more of these keywords: BMB, CML remission, Bone pain

1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users