Mine is up to 108 after a year on Gleevec, and ideas?
Trey?
Posted 05 February 2015 - 01:25 PM
Mine is up to 108 after a year on Gleevec, and ideas?
Trey?
Posted 05 February 2015 - 02:23 PM
Yes, it can. Mine is higher, almost certainly due to Gleevec.
Posted 05 February 2015 - 03:04 PM
Posted 05 February 2015 - 03:16 PM
When on Gleevac I had my fasting glucose increase as well. Always right around the upper end of normal. Then it dropped after switching to Sprycel and is now increasing again.
Posted 05 February 2015 - 09:19 PM
Posted 05 February 2015 - 10:10 PM
Posted 06 February 2015 - 08:29 AM
Mine was also higher. BTW, I am not diabetic and I don't know if anyone else who replied is either. I remember when I first started on Sprycel it would run between 110-120 fasting! Now it's down to between 90-100 fasting. I don't think I'll ever get it below 90 again.
Pat
"You can't change the direction of the wind but you can adjust your sails."
DX 12/08; Gleevec 400mg; liver toxicity; Sprycel 100mg.; CCyR 4/10; MMR 8/10; Pleural Effusion 2/12; Sprycel 50mg. Maintaining MMR; 2/15 PCRU; 8/16 drifting in and out of undetected like a wave meeting the shore. Retired 12/23/2016! 18 months of PCRU, most recent at Mayo on 7/25/17 was negative at their new sensitivity reporting of 0.003.<p>
Posted 06 February 2015 - 12:28 PM
I'm so glad I logged on today and found this. At my last medical the fasting blood sugar was high enough that they referred me for a HbA1c test (which turned out to be normal). It never occurred to me that it might be the Glivec. Something else to cross off the worry list!
Posted 06 February 2015 - 01:19 PM
But you don't necessarily get diabetes right?
Posted 06 February 2015 - 04:31 PM
Okay, so I may be looking on the bright side here (unusual for me). I was working in the principle of 'your glucose management systems aren't buggered, it's just the drugs give a test result that looks like they are'. Prima facie, I suppose, 'everything is buggered and the drugs caused it' also works as an explanation.
A quick google of 'Gleevec and diabetes' however brings up lots of links to 'Gleevec may be a great new treatment for' rather than 'Gleevec may cause' so I may have been right after all
Posted 06 February 2015 - 06:33 PM
Buggered either way....bugger.
But that diabetes treatment thingy didn't pan out. Last I knew that idea was squashed like a bug....ger.
Posted 06 February 2015 - 07:09 PM
Posted 06 February 2015 - 10:54 PM
Tasigna is the TKI most commonly associated with elevated glucose. With Gleevec, some tests were done to test the hypothesis that glucose would improve. I'm not sure if the studies turned out to be definitive.
Posted 25 February 2015 - 12:39 AM
Posted 26 February 2015 - 04:26 PM
Posted 26 February 2015 - 07:41 PM
I was on Gleevec for 2 1/2 years and I've been on Sprycel for almost 3 years. They both caused my fasting glucose to run higher than is listed for a normal FBS.
Posted 26 February 2015 - 07:44 PM
The meds for CML don't cause diabetes per se......
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users