Jump to content


Photo

PCR went up Please advise


  • Please log in to reply
9 replies to this topic

#1 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 10 September 2013 - 08:36 PM

I was diagnosed with CML in December 2012. My PCR was 53%. In March it was 41?. June was 1.69?. Now September is 5.63?. 400 mg gleevec every day, same time of day. I had mono in July and took a few days of as steroid. Other than that everything has been pretty good. I just knew I would be at 0! any suggestions? Also I am 43, female.......


Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#2 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 10 September 2013 - 09:24 PM

You could see what the next PCR result is (I would repeat the PCR soon) or switch drugs at any time you wish.  No sign of a serious issue, but not necessarily speedy progress, either.  Another drug might be the best option.



#3 markandelly

markandelly

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 8 posts

Posted 10 September 2013 - 09:43 PM

agreed Trey. 



#4 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 11 September 2013 - 07:23 AM

Hannibellemo....you responded to my post on "Who has CML"....you wrote that the levels of response are CHR, CCyR, MMR, and CMR or PCRU....can you tell me what % puts you in each category?  Like I said in my original post here I went from 53 to 41 to 1.69 to 5.63 and now I am very stressed.


Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#5 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 11 September 2013 - 12:46 PM

You are probably hovering around CCyR, which is approx 1% or 2 log decrease in PCR, or zero FISH or BMB.  That is acceptable/average progress in under a year.  Everyone would like to be above average, but definitionally most are average.  If your PCRs are International Standard, CCyR is about 1%.  MMR is .1% or 3 log reduction from diagnosis.  But if it stresses you, the solution is a drug change.  Changing TKIs should be like changing shoes if they don't fit right.

More info:

http://community.lls.org/docs/DOC-1273



#6 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 10 December 2013 - 12:30 PM

Hey everyone, my original post from above shows I was on Gleevec 400mg and went from 53%(Dec 2012) to 41%(March 2013) to 1.69%(June 2013) then to 5.63%(Sept 2013).  They switched me to Sprycel 100mg after Sept results went up and I am at 1.1% (Dec 2013) These are not log and not international just percentages. So where am I?  Is this good or bad? It has been a year and I want to be at zero....please advise.  Trey from everything I have read you are the man so what do you think?  I read what you wrote before but you discussed log and international and mine are just percentages.


Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#7 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 10 December 2013 - 12:30 PM

Hey everyone, my original post from above shows I was on Gleevec 400mg and went from 53%(Dec 2012) to 41%(March 2013) to 1.69%(June 2013) then to 5.63%(Sept 2013).  They switched me to Sprycel 100mg after Sept results went up and I am at 1.1% (Dec 2013) These are not log and not international just percentages. So where am I?  Is this good or bad? It has been a year and I want to be at zero....please advise.  Trey from everything I have read you are the man so what do you think?  I read what you wrote before but you discussed log and international and mine are just percentages.


Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#8 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 10 December 2013 - 09:08 PM

If the PCR was done at the same lab as the other previous ones, then it appears to be going in the right direction. 

Ask your Onc to put the results into a log reduction format.  Almost every major lab does that, so it should already be on your PCR report.  That will provide a more accurate assessment of progress than raw percentage numbers. 

The recent drug change seems to be doing well for you.  I would say you have reason to be pleased with the recent result. 



#9 CML2012

CML2012

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 65 posts
  • LocationCharlotte North Carolina

Posted 03 January 2014 - 10:04 PM

Trey this is what I finally got from the doc...Sorry it is taken so long  My Dec results were 1.1% for PCR.  I asked them for a log reduction format and this is what I received:

(bcr/abl1)/abl1 international scale percent ratio 1.1%.......The copy number for each target is calculated based upon calibrators linked to the WHO bcr-abl1 international reporting scale.  A complete cytrogenetic response is associated with a 2 log (bcr/abl1) level reduction or 1.0% on the international scale.  A major molecular response is associated with a 3 log (bcr/abl 1) level reduction or 0.1% on the international scale.

Any thoughts.....


Diagnosed CML December 2012
Gleevec 400 mg
PCR 53%, 41%, 1.69%, 5.63% (Mutation test negative) September 2013
Sprycel 100 mg
PCR 1.1%, 0.2%, 0.2%, 0.6%, .09%, .06%, PCRU June 2015, PCRU Sept 2015, PCRU Dec 2015, 0.042% Mar 2016, 0.122% April 2016, 0.19% June 2016, 0.176% July 2016, .052% Sept 2016, .031% Nov 2016
Diagnosed Basel Skin Cancer December 2012, October 2014 (All cancer removed)
Diagnosed Melanoma April 2015 (All cancer removed)

#10 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 03 January 2014 - 11:46 PM

So you are at Complete Cytogenetic Response (CCyR) as shown by the roughly 1% IS PCR.  You have achieved CCyR in 12 months, which is on target with the goal for treatment (12 - 18 months).  CCyR is the first level of "zero", meaning zero BMB or FISH.  It would not be reasonable to expect a zero PCR at 12 months for 90% of CML patients.  So overall you have done well.  There is often a flattening (plateau) of PCR results about the one year point, so your recent history is not unusual.  Continuing the Sprycel would be recommended by most Oncs. 






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users