Jump to content


Photo

Another study says: "Imatinib discontinuation safe in CML patients with durable response" (for those who are interested)


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 ChrisC

ChrisC

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 39 posts

Posted 26 August 2013 - 11:40 PM

http://www.healio.co...urable-response

Imatinib discontinuation safe in CML patients with durable response

Imatinib treatment may be discontinued safely and reinitiated effectively in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who demonstrate durable molecular response, according to results of a phase 2 study.

The analysis included 33 patients enrolled on the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial for Hemato-Oncology 51 (HOVON) trial. All patients had chronic myeloid leukemia, underwent prior combination therapy with imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis) and cytarabine, and were continuing to receive imatinib. All patients demonstrated molecular response for at least 2 years.

Researchers randomly assigned the patients to continue treatment with imatinib (n=18) or to discontinue treatment (n=15).

Twelve months after randomization, the rate of relapse was 0% in the continuation group vs. 53% in the discontinuation group.

At 36 months, molecular relapse occurred in three (17%) patients in the continuation group and 10 (67%) patients in the discontinuation group. The three patients in the continuation group who relapsed also had stopped imatinib after randomization.

An as-treated analysis showed 56% of patients in the discontinuation group relapsed at 1 year and 61% relapsed at 2 years, compared with 0% of patients who continued imatinib.

Overall, 12 of the 13 patients who relapsed did so within 7 months of imatinib discontinuation.

"All evaluable patients remained sensitive to imatinib after reinitiation and regained a molecular response," the researchers wrote. "Our data suggest that discontinuation of imatinib is safe in patients with durable molecular response."

Disclosure: See the study for a full list of the researchers' relevant financial disclosures.

Imatinib treatment may be discontinued safely and reinitiated effectively in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia who demonstrate durable molecular response, according to results of a phase 2 study.

The analysis included 33 patients enrolled on the Dutch-Belgian Cooperative Trial for Hemato-Oncology 51 (HOVON) trial. All patients had chronic myeloid leukemia, underwent prior combination therapy with imatinib (Gleevec, Novartis) and cytarabine, and were continuing to receive imatinib. All patients demonstrated molecular response for at least 2 years.

Researchers randomly assigned the patients to continue treatment with imatinib (n=18) or to discontinue treatment (n=15).

Twelve months after randomization, the rate of relapse was 0% in the continuation group vs. 53% in the discontinuation group.

At 36 months, molecular relapse occurred in three (17%) patients in the continuation group and 10 (67%) patients in the discontinuation group. The three patients in the continuation group who relapsed also had stopped imatinib after randomization.

An as-treated analysis showed 56% of patients in the discontinuation group relapsed at 1 year and 61% relapsed at 2 years, compared with 0% of patients who continued imatinib.

Overall, 12 of the 13 patients who relapsed did so within 7 months of imatinib discontinuation.

"All evaluable patients remained sensitive to imatinib after reinitiation and regained a molecular response," the researchers wrote. "Our data suggest that discontinuation of imatinib is safe in patients with durable molecular response."

Disclosure: See the study for a full list of the researchers' relevant financial disclosures.


Be alert, but not overly concerned.

 

• Dx Oct. 22, 2008, WBC 459k, in ICU for 2 days + in hospital 1 week

• Leukapheresis for 1 week, to reduce WBC (wasn't given Hydroxyurea)

• Oct. 28, 2008: CML confirmed, start Gleevec 400mg

• Oct. 31, 2008: sent home when WBC reached 121k

• On/off, reduced dose Gleevec for 7 months

• April 2009: Started Sprycel 100mg

• Sept. 2009: PCRU 0.000

• Sept. 2011: after 2 years steady PCRU & taking Sprycel 100mg before bed, quit Sprycel (with permission)

• Currently: still steady PCRU, testing every 6 months 🤗

— Fatigue, hearing loss continue, alas, but I prefer to think it is all getting better!

 

 


#2 scuba

scuba

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,044 posts
  • LocationHouston, Texas

Posted 27 August 2013 - 07:32 AM

Chris - Thanks for the additional information. My take away is that stopping a TKI (for those who are PCRU) involves little or no risk of disease progression if relapse occurs.

I feel strongly that with a a 50-50 or 60-40 chance that stopping could work and be durable, is worth a try.

I think of Susan and Trey who have been PCRU for YEARS with fast quick responses initially when they first started Gleevec and they could very well be functionally cured right now. And then there were others who had to stop for one reason or another and were able to re-achieve remission once re-started.

It's not in the medical industry's best business interest to encourage people to stop taking a TKI to test remission durability. This is something that each of us would have to be willing to try on our own. At least there is guidance and data now that suggests what we can expect.


Diagnosed 11 May 2011 (100% FiSH, 155% PCR)

with b2a2 BCR-ABL fusion transcript coding for the 210kDa BCR-ABL protein

 

Sprycel: 20 mg per day - taken at lights out with Quercetin and/or Magnesium Taurate

6-8 grams Curcumin C3 complex.

 

2015 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

2016 PCR: < 0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale) 

March        2017 PCR:     0.01% (M.D. Anderson scale)

June          2017 PCR:     "undetected"

September 2017 PCR:     "undetected"


#3 pamsouth

pamsouth

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 10 posts

Posted 27 August 2013 - 11:16 AM

Thanks ChrisC!!  

Sure brighten my day.  I just knew if I waited it out there would be a light at the end of the tunnel. 

HOPE, to not forever be a slave to taking TKI's and the continued or long term toxic side effects, especially in us senior patients who's bodies are a little worn down.  Not that I am not grateful for the drugs, but was hoping for much more in these modern days, when all this research money from the patents are suppose to be getting us closer to a cure.

PamSouth


PamSouth


#4 GerryL

GerryL

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 0 posts

Posted 27 August 2013 - 06:58 PM

Be interesting to see if the results are any better following STIM trials with Tasigna and Sprycel.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users