Jump to content


Photo

The K562 Story


  • Please log in to reply
10 replies to this topic

#1 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 15 June 2009 - 09:21 PM

Many of us who live with CML leukemia, and have sought to learn more about it to enhance our ability to fight this disease, have seen the term "K562" in research reports and other literature about CML.  A research report might say something such as "the K562 cell line was used in the experiment to demonstrate..."  then it proceeds to discuss some aspect of CML research where the K562 cells were used to help prove or disprove a theory.  At first this seems like just another obscure term, something that makes understanding the research report more difficult.  But it is important to realize that K562 was a real person, an individual who had chronic myeloid leukemia.  K562 was a woman, age 53, name unknown except to the few doctors and researchers who originally knew her.  She died in the mid-1970's as a result of CML in blast crisis stage, over two decades prior to the development of Gleevec.  Before dying she granted an unusual request, namely, that her leukemic stem cells might be harvested and maintained alive in perpetuity for medical research.  And so she became the first to donate her leukemic cells to perpetual CML research.  Since then, her living cells have been used by every major researcher who has studied CML, and her cells still remain the primary CML research cell line due to their exceptional qualities to provide useful data to researchers, although other cell donors have followed.  Her immortalized cells are at any given time in thousands of locations around the world, still alive and reproduced as needed for research labs and universities. Her gift had an enormous impact on those of us who live with CML today, and she is responsible for enabling the development of important advances in treating CML.  Indeed, she made possible the discovery and testing of Gleevec and other CML drugs.  We do not know K562's name, but those of us who live with CML do know her.  She is the one who helped save our lives, who made it possible for the development of Gleevec and other drugs, and who will continue to help in the development of the eventual cure for CML.  We may not know her real name, but we know her just the same.  Her cells live on in labs around the globe, and her legacy lives on in us.  We are extremely grateful to you for your incredible gift, K562.

-Trey



#2 Barbiedoll22

Barbiedoll22

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 0 posts

Posted 15 June 2009 - 09:48 PM

How incredibly touching. I have tears in my eyes and a lump in my throat. What an amazing gift to give the world. I'm sure K562 would be proud to have made such a difference.

Barb



#3 SunNsand

SunNsand

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 21 posts

Posted 16 June 2009 - 09:35 AM

  Thank you Trey for bring us this story. I am in awe of her thoughtful, generous gift and so thankful for everyone who has participated in clinical trials. I feel like I've met a friend in K562.

Robin



#4 Trey

Trey

    Advanced Member

  • PS Beta Group
  • PipPipPip
  • 1,705 posts
  • LocationSan Antonio, Texas

Posted 25 December 2009 - 07:18 PM

On a day when we think about gifts, the gift from K562 also comes to mind.  Some of the new folks may not have seen this.



#5 Marnie

Marnie

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 396 posts

Posted 25 December 2009 - 11:03 PM

Thanks for posting this, Trey.  I'm still learning a lot. . .but hadn't come across this piece of information yet.  We owe so much to all of the people who have participated in research and clinical trials.  What an amazing way to make your life count for something!

Marnie



#6 xxgirl

xxgirl

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 58 posts
  • LocationSo Cal

Posted 22 December 2017 - 11:23 AM

Trey is such a wealth of information. 

 

For those that have not seen it, this post deserves to be revisited this holiday season.



#7 Kali

Kali

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 112 posts

Posted 23 December 2017 - 09:24 AM

Thank you Trey for sharing this remarkable story. We have so much to be grateful for. To think that one person's decision has affected thousands of people with this disease and is continuing to advance research is truly amazing.

Diagnosed June 2014. WBC 34.6 and Platelets 710 at diagnosis. Bone Marrow Biopsy pre-op diagnosis: Leukocytosis. Post-op diagnosis: the same, Leukocytosis. No increase in blasts <1%. Quantitative BCR/ABL testing and formal chromosome analyses confirmed CML diagnosis.<p>Supplemental Report: Abnormal BCR/ABL1 FISH result t(9;22). Molecular test for BCR/ABL1 fusion transcript by RT-PCR positive for BCR/ABL1 transcripts, b3a2 at 133.561% and b2a2 at 0.001% and ela2 at 0.001%. Followup monitoring showed negative for ela2. BCRABL1 was 148.007 at diagnosis. Started Sprycel 100 mgm and blood work was normal at 3 weeks. MMR at 3 months: 10/4/14 was 0.106. Stayed in that range with one dip to 0.04 once and back to 0.1 range. Oct. 2015, BCRABL1 was not detected, following with 0.0126, 0.0092, <0.0069, 0.0000, <0.0069, 0.0000. Now on 70 mgm of Sprycel. Continuation of PCR test results: 07/07/2017, 0.0000%, now on 50 mgm of Sprycel, PCR 9/12/17 0.0074%, PCR 11/3/17 0.0000%, PCR 1/17/2018 0.0000%


#8 Melanie

Melanie

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 219 posts
  • LocationArizona

Posted 23 December 2017 - 10:06 AM

Ditto! Incredibly grateful to K562 and all the pioneers who have turned this once very deadly disease into one that now is controlled for 95% of us... and in a relatively very short time frame! So thankful!
Dx - 05/2011; PCR: 15.04; Fish: 87% Slow responder due to pancytopenia. Current - Bosulif - Nov: 2012, Mar 2016 lowered to 300 mg. 07/16 back to 400 mg. Clinical trial drug, Promacta, Feb 2013, for low Platelets.
CyCR - Aug 2014, Positive for 1 chromosome Sep 2015. PCR: 12.77 in Oct, 2012 to 0.04 (MDA) in Mar, 2016. 4/2016 - 0.126 (Local lab (IS); 05/2016 - 0.195 (local); 6/2016 - 0.07 (MDA); 7/2016 - 0.03 (local) 9/13/2016 - 0.16 (MDA); 9/26/2016 - 0.31 (MDA); 11/2016 - 0.012 (local); 01/2017 - 0.24 (MDA); 04/2017 - 0.09 (MDA); Cytogenetics show der(1:7)(q10;p10)7 chromosome mutation. Repeat of Sep 2015. PCR - 6/2017- 0.035 (local); 10/2017- 0.02 (MDA)

#9 SunNsand

SunNsand

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 21 posts

Posted 23 December 2017 - 12:43 PM

I just read this again, eternally grateful for people like her. This reminds me of the story of Henrietta Lacks.

#10 r06ue1

r06ue1

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 426 posts
  • LocationEarth, Solar System, Milky Way, Local Group, Virgo Supercluster, Laniakea

Posted 26 December 2017 - 07:54 AM

Thanks for that Trey.  

 

When I see people attacking Science I often remind them of everything the world is today is due to Science and the Scientific Method.  Without both Scientists and those that donate to Science, we would still be living in caves today.


08/2015 Initial PCR: 66.392%

12/2015 PCR: 1.573%

03/2016 PCR: 0.153%

06/2016 PCR: 0.070%

09/2016 PCR: 0.052%

12/2016 PCR: 0.036%

03/2017 PCR: 0.029%

06/2017 PCR: 0.028%

09/2017 PCR: 0.025%

12/2017 PCR: 0.018%

 

 

Taking Imatinib 400 mg


#11 trailcml

trailcml

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 24 posts

Posted 28 December 2017 - 03:22 PM

Phenomenal story and thanks so much for sharing!


Diagnosed Age: 45

Diagnosed Date: Feb-19-2015

Drug/dose: Imatinib 300mg (reduced from 400mg on 1/31/2017)

Drug/dose: Imatinib 200mg (reduced from 300mg on 11/15/2017)

 

0 Month PCR = 20% 

3 Month PCR = 0.3% 

6 Month PCR = 0.03%

9 Month PCR = 0.019%

12 Month PCR = 0.0095%

15 Month PCR = 0.0104%

18 Month PCR = 0.0095%

21 Month PCR = 0.0038%

4/5/2017 PCR = 0.0057%

8/23/2017 PCR = 0.0096%

12/13/2017 PCR = 0.0114%





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users