Jump to content


Photo

Well at least we shouldn't get TB


  • Please log in to reply
3 replies to this topic

#1 CallMeLucky

CallMeLucky

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationCT

Posted 17 November 2011 - 11:18 AM

http://www.eurekaler...u-ntt111411.php

[ Back to EurekAlert! ] Public release date: 16-Nov-2011

Print | E-mail  | Share Share  ]  [ Close Window ]

Contact: Holly Korschun

hkorsch@emory.edu

404-727-5696

Emory University

New TB treatment limits infection while reducing drug resistance

It's estimated that nearly one-third of the world's population—more than two billion people—are infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. According to the World Health Organization, 5 to 10 percent of infected people eventually develop active tuberculosis and can transmit the bacterium to others. Almost two million die from the disease each year. But the current treatment regimen for the disease is long and arduous, making patient compliance difficult. As a result, some strains of the bacteria have become resistant to many or all of the available antibiotics.

A team of researchers has shown that M. tuberculosis and several of its close relatives, including M. marinum, exploit a family of host enzymes known as ABL-family tyrosine kinases to gain entry into host cells and to survive once inside. The researchers also showed that imatinib, an Abl-family inhibitor, limits infection, and works just as well against antibiotic resistant strains. Also, when given alongside traditional front-line antibiotics, the drugs worked synergistically to enhance their effectiveness.

The bottom line: by targeting the host—not the mycobacteria itself—researchers were able to reduce the host's mycobacteria load, and even target antibiotic-resistant strains, all while enhancing the effectiveness of front-line antibiotics.

"This study implicates host tyrosine kinases in entry and intracellular survival of M. tuberculosis and M. marinum and suggests that imatinib may have therapeutic efficacy against tuberculosis," says Daniel Kalman, PhD, lead investigator of the study. Kalman is associate professor of pathology in Emory University School of Medicine. Imatinib is known commercially as Gleevec and is already FDA approved.

The study appears online Nov. 16, 2011 and in the Nov. 17, 2011 print issue of Cell Host & Microbe.

Specifically, the researchers found that M. tuberculosis and its relatives exploit ABL within the host cell to gain entry, and then again once inside the cell, to prevent the formation of phagolysosomes. Phagolysosomes normally fuse with lysosomes, which contain enzymes that can break down their contents.

"Once inside the cell, tuberculosis hangs out in phagocytic cells in a compartment called the phagosome," says Kalman. "But what the Mycobacterium does once inside the phagosome is very crafty. It stops the phagosome from fusing with the lysosome, where the bacteria could be killed, and instead replicates and isolates itself. Inhibiting ABL with Gleevec disrupts this carefully orchestrated bacterial survival mechanism, and tips the balance back in our favor."

Because Gleevac targets the host rather than the pathogen it is less likely to engender resistance compared with conventional antibiotics," says Kalman. "And by reducing bacterial load, imatinib will likely reduce the possibility of M. tuberculosis developing resistance against co-administered conventional antibiotics, which could extend the lifespan of these drugs."

###

Study researchers include first author and Emory graduate student Ruth Napier; Kimberly Powell, Emory Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine; M. Analise Zaunbrecher, CDC and former Emory graduate student; Wasiulla Rafi, PhD and Padmini Salgame, PhD UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School; Mani Cheruvu, PhD, and Thomas Shinnick, PhD, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; and William Bornmann, PhD, MD Anderson Cancer Center.

The Robert W. Woodruff Health Sciences Center of Emory University is an academic health science and service center focused on missions of teaching, research, health care and public service.


Date  -  Lab  -  Scale  -  Drug  -  Dosage MG  - PCR
2010/Jul -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 1.2%
2010/Oct -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.25%
2010/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.367%
2011/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.0081%
2011/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2011/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.00084%
2011/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.004%
2012/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2013/Jan -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  50-60-70  - 0%
2013/Mar -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  60-70  - 0%
2013/Apr -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.036%
2013/May -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.046%
2013/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.0239%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0192%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0034%
2013/Oct -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0054%
2014/Jan -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0093%
2014/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.013%
2014/Apr -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0048%
2014/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2014/Nov -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.047%
2014/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0228%
2016/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Dec - Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  100 - 0%
 

 


#2 grannyd

grannyd

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 0 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 11:31 AM

Lucky, when my 2 sons went to the military 7 years ago, my oldest contracted non-active TB while in boot camp. They had to decide to kep him or send him back home. Long story short, they kept him & put him on medicine for 9 month. The medicine had so many possible side effects & had to be taken with 2 different vitimins. Of course now, dealing with the military Drs, they forgot to give him his vitimins for 3 weeks & he became so run down, dehydrated, ran a fever. When he went to sick bay, no one would take the blame & send he just wasn't taking them. He was sent on 2 tours overseas while taking the medicine. Now I wonder, those drugs are so strong, what may come along later in life from them??? I camn't remember the name of the meds & this article just brought it all back to me. Guess we will just have to pray no later effects will happen. Thanks for listening, prayers to all, granny d



#3 PhilB

PhilB

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 130 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 12:06 PM

Thanks for this Lucky.  I'd been thinking about TB as I was off school on the day they did the vaccinations many years ago and had been wondering if I should go and get the vaccination now.  Sounds like I may not need it!



#4 Happycat

Happycat

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 5 posts

Posted 17 November 2011 - 07:23 PM

Interesting use for gleevec.  I like how they exploited  the host's cellular mechanisms rather than the microbe. 

Traci






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users