I was wondering if blast are available in a CBC test?
Or a different test should be done?
Thanks!
Posted 10 November 2011 - 07:12 AM
I was wondering if blast are available in a CBC test?
Or a different test should be done?
Thanks!
Posted 10 November 2011 - 07:34 AM
I think they show up in a CBC if they are present, cause when I was first diagnosed that is what was ordered and I had some.
Posted 10 November 2011 - 08:55 AM
.....as long as the CBC was done "with differential".
Posted 10 November 2011 - 09:17 AM
What exactly is it called on a CBC?
Posted 10 November 2011 - 09:46 AM
If it doesn't say blasts, look for something with the word or abbreviation for Immature, something like "immature granulocytes" or something similar to that.
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:19 PM
Trey, as always you're right. It says "+ diff" on the top of the result
Still, unable to locate where blasts are.
Gave the link because for me this result is scaled bad on my display.
LINK: http://img683.imageshack.us/img683/141/wbcdiff.jpg
Posted 10 November 2011 - 02:44 PM
Depending on the lab and how they report, it is usually written out on a separate line as a noted anomaly, but only if it is worthy of mentioning.
Posted 10 November 2011 - 05:17 PM
Perhaps BA# is the blast count? I get my CBCs from a couple of different offices, but I think at Emory it's noted as IBAS (I = Immature), where the number is expected to be zero.
I'm going to double-check this though, cause I had a similar question about my CBCs and didn't get a chance to ask the specialist.
Dan - Atlanta, GA
CML CP Diagnosed March 2011
Gleevec 400mg
Posted 10 November 2011 - 05:36 PM
BA# should be the basophils.
Posted 11 November 2011 - 10:01 AM
So, from my understanding, there are no blast in the test results because there are none in reality?
Posted 11 November 2011 - 09:02 PM
Right. But since blasts normally stay at "home" (in the marrow) until they become mature unless kicked out due to significant overpopulation, the best way to get a blast count is by using marrow aspirate. This is one case where the marrow is a much better indicator than peripheral blood.
However, it seems that you are worrying about this issue with no evidence to support your worrying. I would find something else to be concerned about.
Posted 12 November 2011 - 05:47 AM
Hi Trey,
Thanks a lot!
I'm more relaxed now.
Have a great day!
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users