Jump to content


Photo

CML: live long and prosper


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 CallMeLucky

CallMeLucky

    Advanced Member

  • Members
  • PipPipPip
  • 216 posts
  • LocationCT

Posted 01 November 2011 - 11:22 AM

http://bloodjournal....18/17/4499.full

CML: live long and prosper

  1. Richard A. Larson

+ Author Affiliations

  1. UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO

Chronic myeloid leukemia provides one of the outstanding success stories in hematologic oncology. Thousands of patients have                      been able to continue their lives because of a remarkably effective, genetically targeted therapy.

Within the lifespan of most hematologists  practicing today, CML has gone from a uniformly fatal disease to a  chronic, subclinical                   disorder that can be managed with a once- or  twice-per-day oral medication. CML is the poster child for targeted  therapy in                   oncology. Indeed, this year the American Society of  Hematology is honoring Dr Janet Rowley and Dr Brian Druker with the  Beutler                   Lecture and Prize for their pioneering work in  translating basic science into a highly effective treatment. In  addition, the                   success of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in CML  has prompted the pharmaceutical industry to pursue new drug development                   in other orphan diseases that are genetically defined,  because the financial returns are high when a disease-suppressive agent                   requires on-going therapy over a long time.

Percentage of CML patients reporting the symptom by level of severity (N = 422).

It has now been 12 years since the first human subjects with refractory CML volunteered to receive imatinib on clinical trials.                   Since then, we have learned that responses occur rapidly and in many cases are quite durable.1 In contrast to the initial concern that malignant cells would rapidly become resistant to inhibition of Bcr/Abl, many patients                   in fact experience deeper and deeper molecular remissions after several years on therapy.2 Some no longer have detectable mRNA for BCR/ABL,  even using highly sensitive RT-PCR methods. Prospective, carefully  monitored clinical studies suggest that perhaps one-half                   of such patients may be able to safely discontinue  imatinib therapy, at least for a period of time, without suffering  recurrent                   disease.3

Imatinib, and the second-generation analogues  nilotinib and dasatinib, are remarkably effective and remarkably well  tolerated.                   Serious side effects have been quite uncommon in large  multicenter clinical trials evaluating these agents in newly diagnosed                   patients with CML in chronic phase. Additional TKIs  bosutinib and ponatinib are making their way through clinical  development                   and the regulatory approval process. In general, these  agents have nonoverlapping toxicities, and it is usually possible to                   switch to an equally effective treatment for patients  who have intolerance to the initial medication.

The current consensus recommendation is that  imatinib, or one of the second-generation Bcr/Abl inhibitors, should be  continued                   life-long as long as the CML clone remains suppressed.  Thus, there is no respite from chronic low-grade adverse events. What                   is the impact of this therapy on a patient's quality  of life? In clinical trials, investigators typically focus on severe                   or life-threatening toxicities and develop management  strategies for minimizing them or avoiding them altogether. Particularly                   in oncology, low-grade, treatment-related toxicities  are generally considered to be the price that patients must pay to  prolong                   their survival.4 But what about CML patients who now expect to live out their normal  lifespan? Are there chronic, cumulative, or late effects                   from these TKIs that impact on patients' activities of  daily life and feelings of well-being, and thus might also interfere                   with their adherence to daily dosing?

In this issue of Blood, Efficace and  colleagues report on a survey measuring the health-related quality of  life (QOL) reported by > 400 CML patients                   in Italy.5 These patients had been taking imatinib for 3-9 years. Although  patients older than 60 years had QOL profiles very similar                   to those reported by the general population, younger  patients, and women in particular, reported marked impairments due in                   part to physical and emotional problems. Fatigue was  the most frequently reported symptom, followed by muscle cramps, pain,                   and edema (see figure). Remarkably, over one-quarter  of all respondents stated that these 4 symptoms bothered them "quite                   a bit or very much," despite a median of 5 years on  imatinib treatment. Because lack of adherence to daily dosing appears                   to be one of the major causes of imatinib treatment  failure, it is important for hematologists to appreciate the frequency                   and severity of these on-going adverse effects in  their patients.6 Effective management to reduce or eliminate these "low grade" symptoms  is a necessary adjunct to prolonged, life-saving antileukemia                   therapy.

Footnotes

  • Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The author declares no competing financial interests. ?

REFERENCES

  1. ?
    1. Druker BJ,
    2. Guilhot F,
    3. O'Brien SG,
    4. Gathmann I,
    5. et al
    . Five-year follow-up of patients receiving imatinib for chronic myeloid leukemia. N Engl J Med 2006;355(23):2408-2417.
  2. ?
    1. Hughes TP,
    2. Hochhaus A,
    3. Branford S,
    4. Müller MC,
    5. et al
    . Long-term prognostic significance of early molecular response to imatinib in newly diagnosed chronic myeloid leukemia: an                                     analysis from the International Randomized Study of Interferon and STI571 (IRIS). Blood 2010;116(19):3758-3765.
  3. ?
    1. Mahon FX,
    2. Réa D,
    3. Guilhot J,
    4. Guilhot F,
    5. et al
    . Discontinuation of imatinib in patients with chronic myeloid leukaemia who have maintained complete molecular remission for                                     at least 2 years: the prospective, multicentre Stop Imatinib (STIM) trial. Lancet Oncol 2010;11(11):1029-1035.
  4. ?
    1. Hahn EA,
    2. Glendenning GA,
    3. Sorensen MV,
    4. Hudgens SA,
    5. et al
    . Quality of life in patients with newly diagnosed chronic phase chronic myeloid leukemia on imatinib versus interferon alfa                                     plus low-dose cytarabine: results from the IRIS Study. J Clin Oncol21(11):2138-2146. 20031.
  5. ?
    1. Efficace R,
    2. Baccarani M,
    3. Breccia M,
    4. Alimena G,
    5. et al
    . Health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving long term therapy with imatinib compared with                                     the general population. Blood 2011;118(17):4554-4560.
  6. ?
    1. Ibrahim AR,
    2. Eliasson L,
    3. Apperley JF,
    4. Milojkovic D,
    5. et al
    . Poor adherence is the main reason for loss of CCyR and imatinib failure for chronic myeloid leukemia patients on long-term                                     therapy. Blood 2011;117(14):3733-3736.

Related Article

  • Regular Article - Clinical Trials and Observations: 
    • Fabio Efficace,
    • Michele Baccarani,
    • Massimo Breccia,
    • Giuliana Alimena,
    • Gianantonio Rosti,
    • Francesco Cottone,
    • Giorgio Lambertenghi Deliliers,
    • Claudia Baratè,
    • Antonella Russo Rossi,
    • Giuseppe Fioritoni,
    • Luigia Luciano,
    • Diamante Turri,
    • Bruno Martino,
    • Francesco Di Raimondo,
    • Melissa Dabusti,
    • Micaela Bergamaschi,
    • Pietro Leoni,
    • Maria Pina Simula,
    • Luciano Levato,
    • Stefano Ulisciani,
    • Dino Veneri,
    • Simona Sica,
    • Alessandro Rambaldi,
    • Marco Vignetti,
    • and Franco Mandelli
    Health-related quality of life in chronic myeloid leukemia patients receiving long-term therapy with imatinib compared with                            the general population  Blood 2011 blood-2011-04-347575; published ahead of print July 12, 2011,  doi:10.1182/blood-2011-04-347575

Date  -  Lab  -  Scale  -  Drug  -  Dosage MG  - PCR
2010/Jul -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 1.2%
2010/Oct -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.25%
2010/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.367%
2011/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.0081%
2011/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2011/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.00084%
2011/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Mar -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0.004%
2012/Jun -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Sep -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Gleevec  - 400 - 0%
2012/Dec -  MSKCC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2013/Jan -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  50-60-70  - 0%
2013/Mar -  Quest  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  60-70  - 0%
2013/Apr -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.036%
2013/May -  CUMC  -  Non-IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.046%
2013/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 50 - 0.0239%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0192%
2013/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0034%
2013/Oct -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0054%
2014/Jan -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 70 - 0.0093%
2014/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.013%
2014/Apr -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0048%
2014/Jul -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2014/Nov -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.047%
2014/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2015/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0.0228%
2016/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2016/Dec -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Mar -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Jun -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Sep -  Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  - 100 - 0%
2017/Dec - Genoptix  -  IS  -  Sprycel  -  100 - 0%
 

 


#2 CDW

CDW

    New Member

  • Members
  • Pip
  • 4 posts

Posted 01 November 2011 - 02:36 PM

Thanks for posting Gary. I found the complete article really interesting, especially the effects of social function and vitality in the 18-39 age group. It is also interesting how the therapy seems to adversely impact the lives of females. I think studies like this are really important because without them why would the drug companies bother to develop and market anything better? Let's see what the results are like for bosutinib and posatinib in several years time and if those make a real difference to quality of life.



#3 Lisal

Lisal

    Member

  • Members
  • PipPip
  • 18 posts

Posted 02 November 2011 - 05:45 PM

Thanks for posting this!  Fatigue is why I am getting ready to try Sprycel!  I'm glad they are looking at the Quality of LIfe with low grade adverse events.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users